MedPath

Diluting With Cerebrospinal Fluid Versus Traditional Intrathecal Administration: Antishivering Effects

Not Applicable
Withdrawn
Conditions
Antishivering Effects
Registration Number
NCT02189655
Lead Sponsor
China Medical University, China
Brief Summary

This prospective randomized double-blinded study was conducted to compare the antishivering effects of two different types of intrathecal administration.

Detailed Description

This prospective randomized double-blinded study was conducted to compare the antishivering effects of two different types of intrathecal administration.Group Control:traditional intrathecal administration; Group Diluting:Diluting with cerebrospinal fluid

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
WITHDRAWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ who were scheduled for elective surgery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with pre-operative fever (>38℃), diabetes, , Parkinson's disease, hypo or hyperthyroidism, Raynaud's syndrome, obese patients (weight >100 kg), patients shorter than 152 cm, those with a history of allergy to the study medications, and patients receiving vasodilators were excluded from the study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
antishivering effects of two different types of spinal anesthesiatime point 1: 15 minuntes after spinal anesthesia and time point 2 : when patiets were sent to postoperation care unit

antishivering effects of two different types administration of spinal anesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

the First Hospital of China Medical University

🇨🇳

Shenyang, Liaoning, China

the First Hospital of China Medical University
🇨🇳Shenyang, Liaoning, China

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.