MWM Technique in Patients With Knee OA
- Conditions
- Mobilization
- Interventions
- Other: Mulligan Mobilization with Movement Technique
- Registration Number
- NCT06280365
- Lead Sponsor
- Okan University
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the MWM technique on pain, normal joint movement, proprioception and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).
- Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the MWM technique on pain, normal joint movement, muscle strength, proprioception, mobility, balance, functionality and quality of life in patients with knee OA.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
- being diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis,
- being diagnosed with knee OA at the earliest 6 months ago
- Participants who were pregnant,
- had knee surgery, had an infection,
- had a pacemaker, had an infraction,
- had cancer, or were receiving corticosteroid treatment were excluded from the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description MWM group Mulligan Mobilization with Movement Technique Participants in group 2 will receive MWM technique treatment 3 times a week for 4 weeks. The patient should lie face down with a pillow over the knee and the physiotherapist should stand on the contralateral side for the application. The physiotherapist passes the belt around the waist to the patient's tibia edge. The knee is stabilized with one hand while the leg is supported with the other hand. The knee is moved medially without applying too much force through the belt and the patient is asked to stretch. If there is no pain, the movement is indicated. If pain occurs during the movement, the same procedure is performed for the lateral side by changing the position. It is important that the arch remains horizontal and does not cause rotation of the hip. The movement will be repeated 3 times at the point where there is no pain.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Evaluation of proprioception 4-week change in proprioception To assess the participants' sense of proprioception, the method of actively reproducing the passive position without supporting the limb was used. In this assessment, where the angle is measured with a goniometer, the person closes their eyes. The limb is passively moved to the target angle and the person is asked to concentrate on the position. After 10 seconds, the starting point of the movement is returned. The person tries to find the target angle by actively moving the same limb. If the angle achieved at the end of the movement is different from the target angle, the difference is recorded as the deviation angle (used to 15° and 45° knee flexion).
The range of motion 4-week A goniometer (Baseline plastic goniometer), which provides numerical and objective results, was used to measure the range of motion of the participants. Knee flexion for normal range of motion in the knee region and knee extension angles were evaluated.
Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) 4-week This survey is conducted to evaluate how much the routine activities in the participants' lives are affected by the knee problem. The survey included the following parameters: pain, physical function, and stiffness. A Likert system ranging from 1 to 5 is used. As the value increases, the intensity of the parameters increases
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 4 week change in pain intensity VAS, which digitizes parameter values that cannot be measured numerically, was used to evaluate the pain intensity of the participants. The two extreme values of the parameter to be measured are written on the scale as 0 and 10. The person is asked to mark the value that best suits him/her on the scale. For pain, no pain and very severe pain; It is specified as 0 and 10. The person chooses a value according to his/her pain
Short form-36 (SF-36) 4-week change in quality of life SF-36, developed in 1992, consists of 36 items providing measurement to the following 8 dimensions: physical functioning (10 items), social functioning (2 items), role limitations due to physical problems (4 items), role limitations due to emotional problems (3 items), mental health (5 items), energy/vitality (4 items), pain (2 items), and general health perception (5 items). An increase in the score indicates a higher rate of improvement in health status.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Emine Atıcı
🇹🇷Tuzla, İstanbul, Turkey