Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05919784
NCT05919784CompletedNot Applicable

Examining the Effectiveness of a Group Cognitive-behavioural Treatment Program for Persistent Genital Arousal Disorder/Genitopelvic Dysesthesia

Dr. Caroline Pukall2 sites in 1 country8 target enrollmentStarted: April 24, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
8
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Symptom distress

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study seeks to provide information regarding the effectiveness of a virtual, synchronous cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) group program for women with Persistent Genital Arousal Disorder/Genitopelvic Dysesthesia (PGAD/GPD). The program consists of 8 weekly sessions of two hours each, which focus on education and understanding, and learning skills and strategies to manage PGAD/GPD symptoms, and related mental health and lifestyle impacts, as well as structured opportunities for discussion and shared reflection. The group therapy program involves elements based in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT). Participants in the present study will provide responses to online surveys (before, during, and immediately after treatment, also 3 and 6 months after treatment) regarding their PGAD/GPD symptoms, mental health symptoms, and sexual wellness (sexual pleasure and distress).

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • at least 18 years of age
  • fluent in English
  • have a physician-based diagnosis of PGAD/GPD
  • reside in Ontario, Canada
  • be comfortable answering questions about their health (mental and physical) and sexuality in online surveys
  • be comfortable discussing their mental and physical health and PGAD/GPD symptoms in group online therapy sessions with video on

Exclusion Criteria

  • under the age of 18 years
  • nonfluent in English
  • lack of physician based diagnosis of PGAD/GPD
  • not comfortable with answering questions about mental, physical, sexual health
  • not comfortable with discussing mental and physical health and PGAD/GPD symptoms in group online therapy sessions with video on
  • mental or physical health conditions that preclude involvement in group therapy

Arms & Interventions

Cognitive behavioural therapy

Experimental

The group therapy program (virtual, synchronous) involves elements based in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), and Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT).

Intervention: Cognitive behavioural therapy (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Symptom distress

Time Frame: 6 months after the end of the program

Symptom distress on a scale of 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom intensity

Time Frame: 6 months after the end of the program

Symptom intensity on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extremely intense symptoms). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom intensity

Time Frame: Week 3 of program

Symptom intensity on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extremely intense symptoms). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom intensity

Time Frame: Baseline

Symptom intensity on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extremely intense symptoms). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom intensity

Time Frame: Week 1 of program

Symptom intensity on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extremely intense symptoms). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom intensity

Time Frame: Week 2 of program

Symptom intensity on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extremely intense symptoms). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom intensity

Time Frame: Week 4 of program

Symptom intensity on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extremely intense symptoms). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom intensity

Time Frame: Week 5 of program

Symptom intensity on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extremely intense symptoms). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom intensity

Time Frame: Week 6 of program

Symptom intensity on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extremely intense symptoms). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom intensity

Time Frame: Week 7 of program

Symptom intensity on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extremely intense symptoms). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom intensity

Time Frame: Week 8 of program

Symptom intensity on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extremely intense symptoms). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom intensity

Time Frame: 3 months after the end of the program

Symptom intensity on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extremely intense symptoms). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom distress

Time Frame: Baseline

Symptom distress on a scale of 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom distress

Time Frame: Week 1 of program

Symptom distress on a scale of 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom distress

Time Frame: Week 2 of program

Symptom distress on a scale of 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom distress

Time Frame: Week 3 of program

Symptom distress on a scale of 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom distress

Time Frame: Week 4 of program

Symptom distress on a scale of 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom distress

Time Frame: Week 5 of program

Symptom distress on a scale of 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom distress

Time Frame: Week 6 of program

Symptom distress on a scale of 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom distress

Time Frame: Week 7 of program

Symptom distress on a scale of 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom distress

Time Frame: Week 8 of program

Symptom distress on a scale of 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Symptom distress

Time Frame: 3 months after the end of the program

Symptom distress on a scale of 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). Range is 0-10. Higher scores are worse.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Symptom catastrophizing(6 months after the end of the program)
  • Symptom self-efficacy(6 months after the end of the program)
  • Resilience(6 months after the end of the program)
  • Symptom self-efficacy(Week 1 of program)
  • Symptom catastrophizing(Baseline)
  • Symptom catastrophizing(Week 1 of program)
  • Symptom catastrophizing(Week 2 of program)
  • Symptom catastrophizing(Week 3 of program)
  • Symptom catastrophizing(Week 4 of program)
  • Symptom catastrophizing(Week 5 of program)
  • Symptom catastrophizing(Week 6 of program)
  • Symptom catastrophizing(Week 7 of program)
  • Symptom catastrophizing(Week 8 of program)
  • Symptom catastrophizing(3 months after the end of the program)
  • Symptom self-efficacy(Baseline)
  • Symptom self-efficacy(Week 2 of program)
  • Symptom self-efficacy(Week 3 of program)
  • Symptom self-efficacy(Week 4 of program)
  • Symptom self-efficacy(Week 5 of program)
  • Symptom self-efficacy(Week 6 of program)
  • Symptom self-efficacy(Week 7 of program)
  • Symptom self-efficacy(Week 8 of program)
  • Symptom self-efficacy(3 months after the end of the program)
  • Resilience(Baseline)
  • Resilience(Week 1 of program)
  • Resilience(Week 2 of program)
  • Resilience(Week 3 of program)
  • Resilience(Week 4 of program)
  • Resilience(Week 5 of program)
  • Resilience(Week 6 of program)
  • Resilience(Week 7 of program)
  • Resilience(Week 8 of program)
  • Resilience(3 months after the end of the program)

Investigators

Sponsor
Dr. Caroline Pukall
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr. Caroline Pukall

Professor

Queen's University

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials