Custom-made Ceramic Barrier vs Titanium Mesh
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Bone Loss
- Interventions
- Device: Ceramic barrierDevice: Titanium Mesh
- Registration Number
- NCT03734094
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
It is a comparative study between custom-made ceramic barrier and titanium mesh for augmentation of atrophic posterior mandible.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 14
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients with atrophic posterior mandible
- Both sexes
- No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology
- No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement
Exclusion Criteria
- Untreated gingivitis
- Periodontitis
- Insufficient oral hygiene
- Previous radiation therapy
- Head and neck neoplasia
- Systemic disorders
- Heavy smokers
- Bone pathology
- Psychiatric problems
- Emotional instability
- Unrealistic aesthetic demands
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Titanium mesh Ceramic barrier The use of a titanium mesh to induce bone formation during GBR Ceramic Barrier Titanium Mesh The use of a ceramic barrier to induce bone formation during GBR
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Bone height 6 months CBCT \& Three dimensional planning software to measure the height of bone gained in millimeters.
Bone width 6 months CBCT \& Three dimensional planning software to measure the width of bone gained in millimeters.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Histomorphometric - bone area percent 6 months Histomorphometric analysis of bone area percent
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Cairo University
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt