A randomized comparison of size selection strategies for I Gel with regard to patient weight and thyroid cartilage width measurement
试验速览
- 阶段
- Unknown
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 150
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Measurement of oropharyngeal leak pressure
研究概览
简要总结
This study evaluates three methods for selecting the appropriate size of the I-Gel airway device in anesthetized patients: manufacturer’s weight-based formula, external thyroid cartilage width measurement using vernier calipers, and ultrasound-guided internal thyroid cartilage width measurement. A total of 150 patients will be randomized into three groups (n=50 each). Anesthetists and outcome assessors will know group assignments, while participants and data analysts will remain blinded.All patients will receive standard anesthesia management, including IV midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and atracurium. I-Gel placement will follow the assigned method. Oropharyngeal leakage pressure (OLP) will be measured to assess seal quality, and mechanical ventilation will be initiated in volume-controlled mode. Ultrasound will be used to evaluate I-Gel positioning, focusing on air leakage, epiglottis movement, and asymmetry at the thyroid cartilage and hyoid bone levels. Misplacement will be determined using ultrasound and clinical criteria such as abdominal distension, audible air leaks, or tidal volume loss exceeding 20%. Misplaced devices will be resized, and failed placements will result in tracheal intubation.
Postoperative care includes antiemetics, reversal of neuromuscular blockade, and monitoring in the recovery unit. Key outcomes measured include OLP, leak fraction, necessity for manipulation or failure, and presence of blood on the device.
Data will be analyzed using SPSS software. Continuous variables will be compared using ANOVA, while categorical variables will be analyzed with the chi-square test. Statistical significance is set at p < 0.05.
This study aims to determine whether thyroid cartilage-based sizing methods improve I-Gel placement success and reduce complications compared to the traditional weight-based formula, potentially improving airway management precision.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients requiring General Anesthesia for Surgery.
排除标准
- •Patient refusal Weight more than 100kg, ASA status of 3 or more, Patients with lung disease, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, cervical disease or head and neck malformations, History of gastro esophageal reflux, Emergency surgery Unstable hemodynamic status.
结局指标
主要结局
Measurement of oropharyngeal leak pressure
时间窗: After I gel insertion- 0 minutes
次要结局
- 1. leak fraction (%) calculated as [(TVinsp - TVexp) ÷ TVinsp]
- Presence of blood on the surface of the device.(After removal of I gel- 2-3 hours)
研究者
Anjum Naz
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
