MedPath

EPIMix Versus CT Brain Pediatric Study

Completed
Conditions
Brain Diseases
Registration Number
NCT03847051
Lead Sponsor
Karolinska University Hospital
Brief Summary

This study aims to assess the diagnostic feasibility and diagnostic performance of a new fast MR sequence EPIMix for neuroradiological evaluation in comparison to computed tomography of brain in pediatric population.

Detailed Description

The study aims to assess the feasibility of fast MR sequence for neuroradiological evaluation in comparison to computed tomography of brain in pediatric population. Imaging quality is analysed with regards to artefacts and lesion conspicuity as well as its diagnostic potential in rendering a probable diagnosis. The primary study aim is to define feasibility and the AUC for diagnostic performance of minute MRI compared to computed tomography.

Included patients are children age 4-18 with suspicion of cerebral pathology with referral to elective computed tomography of the brain.

Study participants are in addition to computed tomography investigated during same day at 3T MR.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
15
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age 4-18 years.
  • Patient with suspicion of cerebral pathology.
  • Referral to elective brain CT study.
Exclusion Criteria
  • CT planned with sedation
  • known previous cerebral pathology (follow up study)
  • Emergency CT
  • Aborted MR exam

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Diagnostic potentialAt 0 hours

Diagnostic accuracy to categorize scan as normal or abnormal on a five point Likert scale (1 - definitely normal, 2 - Probably normal, 3 - Indeterminate, 4 - Probably abnormal, 5 - Definitely abnormal) compared to abnormal/normal brain CT.

Tolerance of a new fast MR method in childrenAt 0 hours

Number of aborted MR

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
ArtefactsAt 0 hours

Artefacts and impact (Motion, Beam hardening, Other) defined as; Not present, Not affecting diagnostic confidence, Degrading diagnostic confidence)

Lesion classificationAt 0 hours

Classification into disease categories (Neoplastic, Ischemic, Hemorrhagic, Infection, Neuroinflammation, Hydrocephalus, Congenital malformation, Indeterminate)

Lesion location determinationAt 0 hours

Anatomical localization of abnormality (Cerebrum, Cerebellum, Brainstem, Intraventricular, Subarachnoid space including basal cisterns, Intra-orbital, Skull/Skull base/dural, Other)

Lesion descriptionAt 0 hours

For example effect on brain parenchyma and size

Clinical diagnostic summary reportAt 0 hours

Text (one sentence summary of the finding including type of lesion and location)

Diagnostic imaging qualityAt 0 hours

Diagnostic imaging quality (5 point Likert scale; 1 - Excellent diagnostic imaging quality, 2 - Good diagnostic imaging quality, 3 - Sufficient diagnostic imaging quality, 4 - Restricted diagnostic imaging quality, 5 - Poor diagnostic imaging quality)

Diagnostic confidenceAt 0 hours

Five point Likert scale (Very confident, Predominantly confident, Fairly confident, Only slightly confident, Not at all confident)

Ability to rule out diseasesAt 0 hours

A list of diseases. Number of positive versus negative cases for each investigation (including: Tumor, Abscess, Parenchymal Haemorrhage, Acute Ischemia, Hydrocephalus, Neuroinflammation, Subarachnoid hemorrhage, Extraaxial fluid collection)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Karolinska University Hospital

πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ͺ

Stockholm, Sweden

Β© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath