EPIMix Versus CT Brain Pediatric Study
- Conditions
- Brain Diseases
- Registration Number
- NCT03847051
- Lead Sponsor
- Karolinska University Hospital
- Brief Summary
This study aims to assess the diagnostic feasibility and diagnostic performance of a new fast MR sequence EPIMix for neuroradiological evaluation in comparison to computed tomography of brain in pediatric population.
- Detailed Description
The study aims to assess the feasibility of fast MR sequence for neuroradiological evaluation in comparison to computed tomography of brain in pediatric population. Imaging quality is analysed with regards to artefacts and lesion conspicuity as well as its diagnostic potential in rendering a probable diagnosis. The primary study aim is to define feasibility and the AUC for diagnostic performance of minute MRI compared to computed tomography.
Included patients are children age 4-18 with suspicion of cerebral pathology with referral to elective computed tomography of the brain.
Study participants are in addition to computed tomography investigated during same day at 3T MR.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 15
- Age 4-18 years.
- Patient with suspicion of cerebral pathology.
- Referral to elective brain CT study.
- CT planned with sedation
- known previous cerebral pathology (follow up study)
- Emergency CT
- Aborted MR exam
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Diagnostic potential At 0 hours Diagnostic accuracy to categorize scan as normal or abnormal on a five point Likert scale (1 - definitely normal, 2 - Probably normal, 3 - Indeterminate, 4 - Probably abnormal, 5 - Definitely abnormal) compared to abnormal/normal brain CT.
Tolerance of a new fast MR method in children At 0 hours Number of aborted MR
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Artefacts At 0 hours Artefacts and impact (Motion, Beam hardening, Other) defined as; Not present, Not affecting diagnostic confidence, Degrading diagnostic confidence)
Lesion classification At 0 hours Classification into disease categories (Neoplastic, Ischemic, Hemorrhagic, Infection, Neuroinflammation, Hydrocephalus, Congenital malformation, Indeterminate)
Lesion location determination At 0 hours Anatomical localization of abnormality (Cerebrum, Cerebellum, Brainstem, Intraventricular, Subarachnoid space including basal cisterns, Intra-orbital, Skull/Skull base/dural, Other)
Lesion description At 0 hours For example effect on brain parenchyma and size
Clinical diagnostic summary report At 0 hours Text (one sentence summary of the finding including type of lesion and location)
Diagnostic imaging quality At 0 hours Diagnostic imaging quality (5 point Likert scale; 1 - Excellent diagnostic imaging quality, 2 - Good diagnostic imaging quality, 3 - Sufficient diagnostic imaging quality, 4 - Restricted diagnostic imaging quality, 5 - Poor diagnostic imaging quality)
Diagnostic confidence At 0 hours Five point Likert scale (Very confident, Predominantly confident, Fairly confident, Only slightly confident, Not at all confident)
Ability to rule out diseases At 0 hours A list of diseases. Number of positive versus negative cases for each investigation (including: Tumor, Abscess, Parenchymal Haemorrhage, Acute Ischemia, Hydrocephalus, Neuroinflammation, Subarachnoid hemorrhage, Extraaxial fluid collection)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Karolinska University Hospital
πΈπͺStockholm, Sweden