Caretaker vs. Routine Blood Pressure Sphygmomanometer
- Conditions
- Blood Pressure
- Interventions
- Device: Caretaker
- Registration Number
- NCT03918486
- Lead Sponsor
- The Cooper Health System
- Brief Summary
Caretaker vs. routine blood pressure sphygmomanometer
- Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to: Compare blood pressure obtained using routine blood pressure sphygmomanometer to a non-invasive device that continuously monitors central blood pressure (CareTaker).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 170
- Adults ages > 18 who are having their blood pressure monitored using routine blood pressure sphygmomanometer.
- Patients not scheduled to be monitored using blood pressure sphygmomanometer.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Caretaker Caretaker Comparing blood pressure obtained using routine blood pressure sphygmomanometer to a non-invasive device that continuously monitors central blood pressure (CareTaker).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparing blood pressure using routine blood pressure cuff to that recorded by the Caretaker device. Length of surgery As per blood pressure monitor validation guidelines, the primary outcome measure will be the average difference in systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements between the investigational device (Caretaker) and the reference (brachial cuff). In line with the ANSI/ISO/AAMI guidelines, we will obtain multiple investigational-reference measurement pairs in each subject (every 5 minutes during the surgical case) and will average the difference over all pairs from all subjects.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Cooper University Hospital
🇺🇸Camden, New Jersey, United States