Effectiveness and Safety of Pharmacopuncture Therapy for Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- Conditions
- Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- Interventions
- Procedure: conservative treatments (including physiotherapy)Procedure: pharmacopuncture
- Registration Number
- NCT05242497
- Lead Sponsor
- Jaseng Medical Foundation
- Brief Summary
This is 1:1 pragmatic randomized controlled trials in a parallel-grouped, multi-centered design that investigated pharmacopuncture therapy for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, compared to the conservative treatments including physiotherapy and pharmacological treatments.
- Detailed Description
This is 1:1 pragmatic randomized controlled trials in a parallel-grouped, multi-centered design that investigated pharmacopuncture therapy for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, compared to the conservative treatments including physiotherapy and pharmacological treatments. The physician will decide specific location, type, and doses of pharmacopuncture therapy or conservative treatments according to each participants' disease conditions, respectively. The researcher will record concurrently.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 98
- Diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis based on radiology including computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
- Clear neurogenic claudication symptoms existed (symptoms aggravated with walking, and alleviated upon resting in lumbar flexion position).
- reported radiating leg pain or low back pain (LBP) with intensity of NRS ≥5
- Between the age of 19 and 69 years old.
- Participants who agreed to participate the study and voluntarily signed the informed consent form.
- Patients with vascular claudication
- Patients with pathologies of non-spinal origin that may cause LBP or radiating leg pain (e.g. spinal tumor, fracture)
- Patients with soft tissue pathologies that may cause LBP or radiating leg pain (e.g. tumor, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, gout)
- Patients with other systemic diseases that may interfere with treatment effect or outcome interpretation
- Patients who administrate those prescribed medicine that may interfere with interpretation of the result (e.g. corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, physchotropic drugs)
- Patients for whom pharmacopuncture treatment may be inappropriate or unsafe (e.g. hemorrhagic diseases, blood clotting disorders, history of anti-coagulation medicine intake, serious diabetes with risk of infection)
- Patients who were treated with one of the following intervention within the past week; medicine that may potentially influence pain such as NSAIDs (nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs), pharmacopuncture, or physical therapies.
- Pregnant patients or patients planning pregnancy
- Patients with medical history of spinal surgery within the past 3 months
- Previous participation in other clinical studies within 1 month of current study enrollment, or plans to participate in other clinical studies during participation (including follow-up period) of the current study after study enrollment
- Patients unable to fill out study participation consent form
- Patients deemed unsuitable for study participation as assessed by the researchers
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description conservative treatment group conservative treatments (including physiotherapy) The physicians will choose the type and time of physical therapy and if needed, pharmacological treatment according to participants' conditions. pharmacopuncture group pharmacopuncture The physicians will choose the type and volume of pharmacopuncture according to participants' conditions.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Numeric rating scale (NRS) week 13 NRS is a pain scale in which the patients indicates their subjective pain as a whole number from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates 'no pain or discomfort' and 10 indicates 'the most severe pain and discomfort imaginable'. The NRS of major painful site, which was chosen between low back and radiation pain in lower extremities, will be reported.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Visual analogue scale (VAS) of low back pain and radiating pain week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 25, 53 The patient indicates their pain severity from minimum 0 to maximum 100, which is a higher score means a worse outcome. VAS of low back pain and radiating leg pain will be reported.
Walking distance week 1, 5, 9, 13, 25, 53 Claudication-free walking distance and maximal walking distance will be evaluated.
Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) week 1, 5, 9, 13, 25, 53 ZCQ is a lumbar spinal stenosis-specific patient reported outcome, which evaluate the disease severity, functional scale and satisfaction at the treatment.
PGIC week 13, 25, 53 Participants rate the improvement after treatment on a 7-point Likert scale (1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse.)
Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12 v2) week 1, 5, 9, 13, 25, 53 The SF-12 consists of 12 questions across 8 domains, and higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.
Numeric rating scale (NRS) of low back pain and radiating pain week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 25, 53 NRS is a pain scale in which the patients indicates their subjective pain as a whole number from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates 'no pain or discomfort' and 10 indicates 'the most severe pain and discomfort imaginable'.
Oswestry disability index (ODI) week 1, 5, 9, 13, 25, 53 ODI is a functional disability questionnaire. The possible range of each item score is 0 to 5. Total score range is 0 (better outcome) to 100 (worse outcome).
EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) week 1, 5, 9, 13, 25, 53 The EQ-5D-5L consists of 5 questions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, anxiety/depression) that ask about the current state of health, and answers each question with 5 likert. (1=I have no problems about, 2=I have slight problems about, 3=I have moderate problems about, 4=I have severe problems about, 5=I am unable to about)
Trial Locations
- Locations (7)
Dongguk University Bundang Oriental Hospital
🇰🇷Seongnam-si, Bundang-gu, Korea, Republic of
Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital
🇰🇷Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Korea, Republic of
Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital at Gangdong
🇰🇷Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Korea, Republic of
Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
🇰🇷Seoul, Gangnam-Gu, Korea, Republic of
Bucheon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
🇰🇷Bucheon, Gyeonggi Province, Korea, Republic of
Haeundae Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
🇰🇷Busan, Korea, Republic of
Daejeon Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine
🇰🇷Daejeon, Korea, Republic of