Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01545739
NCT01545739
Completed
Not Applicable

Master Study of the Evia/Entovis HF-T Pacemaker

Biotronik SE & Co. KG1 site in 1 country122 target enrollmentApril 2012

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Indication for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)
Sponsor
Biotronik SE & Co. KG
Enrollment
122
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Safety: Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) free rate
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The Evia HF-T and the Entovis HF-T are triple-chamber pacemakers for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT-P). The objective of this study is to prove the safety and efficacy of these pacemakers. In particular, the left ventricular (LV) capture control feature is evaluated, which automatically measures the LV pacing threshold and subsequently adjusts the pacing output.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 2012
End Date
December 2013
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Standard indication for CRT therapy
  • Legal capacity and ability to consent
  • Signed patient informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Contraindication for CRT therapy
  • ICD indication
  • Age \< 18 years
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding woman
  • Cardiac surgery planned within the next 6 months
  • Life expectancy of less than 6 months
  • Participating in another clinical study of an investigational cardiac drug or device

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Safety: Serious Adverse Device Effect (SADE) free rate

Time Frame: Until 3 month follow-up

While the investigator is asked to record all adverse events throughout the study, only the number of SADEs possibly or securely related to a device deficiency will be the basis for the calculation of the SADE free rate: (1-number of SADE divided by number of patients)%.

Efficacy of the left ventricular capture control feature (focus on threshold measurements)

Time Frame: At pre-hospital discharge, 1 and 3 month follow-up

Absolute difference between the triggered automatic and manual pacing threshold in the left ventricle is smaller than 0.3 Volt.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Efficacy of the left ventricular capture control feature (focus on pulse amplitude adjustment)(1 and 3 month follow-up)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials