Accuracy Evaluation of Different "All on Four" Impression Techniques Using Plaster Jig
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Enrollment
- 15
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Accuracy of impression technique
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This study will be conducted to evaluate the accuracy of different implant impression techniques using plaster jig Participants will have three types of impression techniques
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Non Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Crossover
- Primary Purpose
- Supportive Care
- Masking
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 55 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Non smokers Good oral hygiene Free from any signs of implant failure and requesting a fixed prosthesis
Exclusion Criteria
- •patients that have severe bone resorption or excessive interarch space
Arms & Interventions
Digital impression
Digital impression using intraoral scanner
Intervention: Impression techniques (Procedure)
One stage open impression technique
Splinting impression long transfer and open tray impression technique
Intervention: Impression techniques (Procedure)
Two stage closed tray and open tray
Primary impression with closed tray impression techniques then secondary impression by open tray technique
Intervention: Impression techniques (Procedure)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Accuracy of impression technique
Time Frame: 3 months
By using plaster jig
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Doaa Abd El-Razik El-Mowafy
Faculty of dentistry, Mansoura University
Mansoura University
