Stereotactic Radiosurgery as Second-line Therapy for Ventricular Tachycardia

Not Applicable

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Ventricular Tachycardia, Monomorphic; Ventricular Tachycardia (VT); Stereotactic Techniques; Cardioverter-Defibrillators, Implantable; Ventricular Tachycardia, Sustained; Ventricular Tachycardia (V-Tach); Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT); Stereotactic Radiation

• Registration Number: NCT07017855
• Lead Sponsor: Medical University of Silesia

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of treating recurrent sustained Ventricular Tachycardia (sVT) after prior Catheter Ablation (CA) in patients with Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) between re-do of conventional endocardial CA and Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR).

Detailed Description

Study Objectives:

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) as a second-line therapy for sustained Ventricular Tachycardia (sVT) in optimally treated patients following endocardial Catheter Ablation (CA).

Study Design:

This study is a single-center randomized, noninferiority, head-to-head control trial comparing the efficacy and safety of two ablation methods for recurrent sVT after failing CA.

Patient Population:

Optimally treated patients aged ≥18 with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICD) in the primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD), who have undergone endocardial CA and are candidates for re-ablation of recurrent symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT) following the 2022 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of SCD.

The planned size of the group is 150.

The planned recruitment period is 42 months, and the observation period is 18 months.

Patients will be randomly assigned to experimental and control groups for a 1:1 group size ratio. The block randomized stratification method will be used with a central randomization system. Sex and left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40% vs. \>40%) will be stratifying factors.

Intervention:

The intervention under investigation (experimental) will be STAR ablation. The standard intervention will be repeated endocardial radiofrequency CA. The target area for sVT ablation will be the arrhythmogenic substrate, defined by electrophysiological study (EPS) with three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping (obligatory in the standard therapy arm, optional in the STAR arm) and imaging tests (i.e., MSCT/CMR/PET-CT). The following will be integrated using dedicated computer software: 1) anatomical data-locating the arrhythmogenic scar area with channels of heterogeneous tissue-obtained using MSCT, CMR, PET-CT/SPECT, 2) three-dimensional electroanatomical maps-locating electrograms showing low peak-to-peak voltage, local abnormal ventricular activities, the sequence of myocardial activation, and critical isthmus sites for re-entrant VT, and 3) electrocardiograms detected during sinus rhythm and ventricular pacing during EPS. In the experimental arm, the obtained data will become the basis for STAR planning by a team consisting of a diagnostic cardiologist, radiologist, electrophysiologist, and radiotherapist. The obtained data will become the basis for endocardial CA planning in the control arm.

Observation:

Observation will include 1) clinical assessment-with the determination of the New York Heart Association functional class and exercise capacity in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT); 2) echocardiography-with the assessment of global and segmental left ventricular systolic function, mitral valve function, and the presence of fluid in the pleural and pericardial cavities; 3) parameters of pacing, sensing, lead impedance, and ventricular arrhythmic events recorded by the ICD/CRT-D; 4) QoL; and 5) procedure-related adverse events. Evaluation will be performed at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months post-procedure, with endpoints assessed at 6 and 18 months.

The co-primary endpoints will assess 1) treatment efficacy, defined as the number of events of monomorphic sVT over six months following the comparison procedures, and 2) treatment safety, defined as no procedure-related serious adverse events.

The most important clinical parameters evaluating the effectiveness of ablation (i.e., post-procedural reduction in the sVT burden, occurrence/time to the first sVT episode, number of adequate ICD/CRT-D therapies, number of hospitalizations for arrhythmic reasons, QoL improvement) and mortality (death from any cause) were selected as secondary endpoints.

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2025-03
• Study First Submitted: 2025-06-04
• Study First Submitted QC: 2025-06-04
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-06-04
• Study First Posted: 2025-06-12
• Last Update Posted: 2025-06-12
• Study Start: 2025-07-01
• Primary Completion: 2027-05-01
• Study Completion: 2028-11-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 150

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥ 18 years at the time of enrollment.
2. Presence of structural heart disease (SHD) of either ischemic or non-ischemic etiology.
3. Implanted ICD or CRT-D device for primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD).
4. History of at least one endocardial CA procedure targeting a substrate of monomorphic sVT.
5. Recurrence of at least one clinically significant and symptomatic episode of monomorphic sVT.
6. Optimal pharmacological treatment of underlying SHD, including maximally tolerated doses of guideline-recommended heart failure therapies and appropriate antiarrhythmic management.
7. Provision of written informed consent prior to study participation.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Reversible cause of sVT recurrence, particularly acute coronary syndrome (ACS), acute myocarditis, or lead-related infective endocarditis (LDIE).
2. Myocardial infarction (MI) or cardiac surgery within the last 40 days.
3. Idiopathic sVT unrelated to SHD or sVT associated with genetically determined channelopathies.
4. Ongoing or persistently recurrent hemodynamically unstable sVT until clinical stabilization is achieved.
5. Acute decompensation of heart failure, classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV, until clinical stabilization is achieved.
6. Worsening angina, classified as Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Class III or IV until coronary diagnostic evaluation and clinical stabilization are completed.
7. A mobile thrombus within the left ventricle (LV).
8. Presence of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD).
9. Presence of comorbidities or known risk factors for CA complications that, in the judgment of the electrophysiologist, constitute a contraindication to the procedure for safety reasons.
10. Active, uncontrolled malignancy and/or chemotherapy or immunotherapy administered or planned within 1 month of the scheduled ablation procedure.
11. Features of an active systemic, pulmonary, or pericardial inflammatory process requiring systemic treatment (disease-modifying therapies, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants) within the past 6 months.
12. Presence of comorbidities or known risk factors for radiotherapy complications that, in the judgment of the radiation oncologist, constitute a contraindication to STAR for safety reasons.
13. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
14. Systemic disease that limits the probability of survival to less than 1 year
15. Other comorbidities, addictions, or social indications that, in the investigator's opinion, would preclude practical cooperation or otherwise disqualify the patient from participation in the clinical study.
16. Refusal to participate or lack of written informed consent for study participation.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The burden of ventricular arrhythmias, defined as the total number of sustained ventricular tachycardia (sVT) events recorded during the 6-month observation period.	6 months	Each documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (sVT) event, captured via electrocardiogram (ECG) or intracardiac electrogram (EGM) from the CIED memory, will be subject to physician adjudication. Automatic classification of arrhythmia type, number of sVT episodes, and number of therapies performed by the CIED will be accepted only in cases where EGM recordings are unavailable, e.g., due to device memory overflow resulting from a high volume of episodes.; sVT criteria: 1. Meets detection criteria in the active VT or VF zone programmed in the ICD/CRT-D and triggers an appropriate therapy; or; 2. Meets detection criteria in the VT monitoring zone programmed in the ICD/CRT-D and lasts ≥ 30 seconds; or; 3. Is misclassified by the ICD/CRT-D as a supraventricular tachycardia but is reclassified as sVT after physician review of the EGM; or; 4. Is recorded on surface ECG with a duration of ≥ 30 seconds.
Absence of treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) during the 18-month follow-up period	18 months	All adverse events (AEs) assessed by the investigator as having a probable causal relationship with either the experimental therapy or standard therapy will be classified as adverse events and recorded in the study protocol.; Serious Adverse Events (SAEs); Each adverse medical event meeting any of the following criteria will be classified as a Serious Adverse Event (SAE): * Results in the death of the patient.; * Is life-threatening to the patient.; * Results in permanent or significant disability or requires intervention to prevent permanent damage to tissues or organs.; * Requires re-hospitalization or leads to an extension of the hospitalization related to the procedure by more than 24 hours.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Reduction in ventricular arrhythmia burden, measured as the percentage decrease in the mean monthly number of sustained ventricular tachycardia events during the 6-month follow-up after therapy initiation, compared to corresponding period pre-treatment	6 months	Sustained ventricular arrhythmias will be counted as stated in the Primary Outcome Measures.
Improvement in quality of life assessed using the Polish version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire during the 18-month follow-up period.	18 months	Improvement in quality of life assessed using the Polish version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire during the 18-month follow-up period.
Occurrence of sVT during the 18-month follow-up period	18 months	Sustained ventricular arrhythmias will be counted as stated in the Primary Outcome Measures.
Time to first occurrence of sVT during the 18-month follow-up period.	18 months	Sustained ventricular arrhythmias will be counted as stated in the Primary Outcome Measures.
Number of appropriate ICD/CRT-D therapies delivered during the 18-month follow-up period.	18 months	Appropriate therapy will be defined as: a. Therapy (ATP or shock) delivered by the ICD/CRT-D due to sVT and confirmed by physician adjudication (after excluding supraventricular arrhythmias and/or sensing abnormalities); or b. External electrical or pharmacological cardioversion following physician-confirmed documentation of sVT on ECG.; Only one therapy will be counted per sVT episode. In cases where multiple therapies are delivered sequentially during a single episode, the final effective therapy leading to episode termination will be considered and counted.
Number of hospitalizations due to arrhythmic causes during the 18-month follow-up period.	18 months	Number of hospitalizations due to arrhythmic causes during the 18-month follow-up period.
All-cause mortality during the 18-month follow-up period.	18 months	All-cause mortality during the 18-month follow-up period.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Electrocardiology, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Centre of the Silesian Medical University in Katowice; 🇵🇱 Katowice, Upper-Silesia, Poland