Maxillary Sinus Lifting: A Comparison Of Success Rate of Direct Versus Indirect Sinus Lifting for Vertical Bone Augmentation in Patients Receiving Dental Implants
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Missing tooth.Complete loss of teethK08.1
- Registration Number
- IRCT20230926059527N2
- Lead Sponsor
- AFID
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Inclusion Criteria
Having physical status 1 according to ASA classification
HaviBone Height Less than 5mm in Maxillary Molar Region
Exclusion Criteria
Pregnant women, nursing mothers & smokers
Patient with infection in Maxillary Molar Region
Patients Having Sinus Pathology
Patient with medications that can alter pain perception
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms underlying bone regeneration in direct versus indirect maxillary sinus lifting procedures?
How does the success rate of direct maxillary sinus lifting compare to indirect methods in terms of long-term implant stability and osseointegration?
Which biomarkers are associated with successful vertical bone augmentation outcomes following maxillary sinus lifting in edentulous patients?
What are the potential adverse events and their management strategies in maxillary sinus lifting techniques for dental implant placement?
Are there any combination approaches or alternative therapies that enhance the efficacy of maxillary sinus lifting compared to standard protocols?