Assessment of the Effect of a Novel Surface Roughness Treatment on Dental Implants on Integration Success
- Conditions
- Partial EdentulismTooth Disease
- Interventions
- Device: Osseotite Certain Tapered Group BDevice: Osseotite Certain Tapered Group ADevice: Osseotite Certain Tapered Group C
- Registration Number
- NCT01529801
- Lead Sponsor
- ZimVie
- Brief Summary
A study where dental implants with different roughened surfaces will be evaluated for the ability to resist countertorque forces.
- Detailed Description
This study on dental implants with different roughened surfaces will assess its ability to resist countertorque testing at various study time points and demonstrate high success
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 80
- patients of either sex and older than 18 years of age
- patients needing at least one dental implant to treat partial edentulism
- patients physically able to tolerate surgical and restorative dental procedures
- patients agreeing to all protocol visits
- patients with infection or severe inflammation at the intended treatment sites
- patients smoking greater than 10 cigarettes per day
- patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- patients with uncontrolled metabolic diseases
- patients who received radiation treatment to the head in the past 12 months
- patients needing bone grafting at the intended treatment sites
- patients known to be pregnant at screening visit
- patients with para-functional habits like bruxing and clenching
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Roughness Group B Osseotite Certain Tapered Group B Osseotite Certain Tapered Group B Roughness group A Osseotite Certain Tapered Group A Osseotite Certain Tapered Group A Roughness Group C Osseotite Certain Tapered Group C Osseotite Certain Tapered Group C
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Primary stability countertorque measures 6 weeks Resistance to countertorque measures showing primary stability and success of the implant
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cumulative success rate 2 years Crestal bone regression (amount of bone loss measured) and equivalence in integration success (implant mobility)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hospital San Jose
🇨🇱Santiago, Chile