Safety and Efficacy of the Apexum Ablator

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Periapical Periodontitis
• Interventions: Device: the Apexum Protocol; Procedure: Conventional endodontic procedure

• Registration Number: NCT00762840
• Lead Sponsor: Apexum Ltd.

Brief Summary

The study is designed to test the hypothesis that there is a difference in healing kinetics and healing rate between teeth treated by conventional endodontic procedure alone and those in which such procedure was supplemented with the Apexum Ablator protocol

Detailed Description

Periapical lesions consist of inflammatory tissue replacing the bone surrounding the root-tip (apex) and are caused by bacteria present in an infected root canal (Metzger 2000). Endodontic (root canal) treatment is performed to eliminate these bacteria from the root canal and prevent its recontamination. The periapical lesion is expected to heal in response to this procedure, with new bone replacing the soft tissue of the lesion. The healing of the lesion may last 6-48 months, depending on its size and individual healing rate (Wang et al 2004).

Not all lesions heal accordingly. Those which fail to heal are subjected to either non-surgical re-treatment or to a surgical procedure called "apicoectomy" (Kim \& Kratchman 2006). The surgical procedure consists of cutting the gums, accessing the periapical tissue through a hole drilled in the cortical bone, followed by curetting the soft tissue out of its bony crypt. After such surgical procedure, bone healing is much quicker (Kvist \& Reit 1999) and even relatively large lesions may heal within 3-6 months. Nevertheless, pain and swelling usually inflict great discomfort causing patients to lose up to 6 working days (Kvist \& Reit 2000).

It is common practice to delay the final dental restoration (crown or bridge) for as long as the periapical lesion has not healed. Even though a surgical intervention could significantly reduce the waiting time, it is not commonly applied due to following: (a) Pain, discomfort and loss of working days, (b) High cost (c) Inaccessibility of many root tips, due to anatomical reasons.

Apexum has developed a family of miniature, minimally invasive surgical tools, facilitating highly innovative methods for the treatment of periapical lesions associated with root canal infection. The Apexum Ablator device allows access to the periapical tissues through the root-canal following the commonly accepted root-canal procedures. The inserted tool grinds the periapical lesion, followed by washing out and aspiration of the ground material.

In the present study, the safety and efficacy of the Apexum Ablator will be assessed in patients with periapical lesions associated with root canal infection by using this clinical investigational plan.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2006-10
• Study First Submitted: 2008-09-29
• Study First Submitted QC: 2008-09-29
• Study First Posted: 2008-09-30
• Status Verified: 2009-06
• Last Update Submitted: 2009-06-04
• Last Update Posted: 2009-06-05
• Primary Completion: 2010-04

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 100

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subject is > 18 years old
2. Subject has periapical lesion(s) associated with root canal infection in one or more roots that have a single root canal per root. These may include upper and lower single rooted incisors, canines or premolars, as well as roots of multi-rooted teeth, providing that they have a single root canal per root. These may include distal roots of lower molars, palatal and disto-buccal roots of upper molars
3. Lesion mean diameter: 3-6 mm, PAI score 4 or 5
4. Roots with mature fully formed apices

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous root canal filling

2. Roots with abnormal root canal morphology

3. Roots with more than one root canal per root, as either evident from the pre-operative radiographs or as discovered during initiation of the root canal treatment

4. A tooth that remained symptomatic after the first and when needed a second session of the root canal treatment (remained with an excessive sensitivity to percussion, persistent sinus tract, persistent exudate in the root canal etc.)

5. Un-restorable teeth

6. Significant periodontal pockets

7. Lack of cortical bone around the lesion, as judged clinically

8. Active acute infection - cellulites, abcess

9. Proximity of anatomical structures to the periapical lesion to the extent that Apexum Ablator enucleation procedure may damage or otherwise jeopardize these structures. Such anatomical structures may include the maxillary sinus, the nasal cavity, the inferior alveolar nerve and its canal, the mental nerve or any other structure that may be jeopardized by the procedure

10. Subject with:

    • Uncontrolled systemic hypertension
    • Severe uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus
    • Current steroid therapy in excess of prednisone 5 mg/day
    • Chronic inflammatory oral disease
    • HIV positive patients
    • Chronic renal failure
    • Hematological disease (malignancy, severe anemia, bleeding tendency etc.)
    • Osteoporosis, receiving biphosphonates
    • Post head and neck irradiation treatment
    • In need of endocarditis antibiotic prophylactic treatment [sub acute bacterial endocarditis (SBE]

11. Other severe or life-threatening systemic disease (ASA P3 and above)

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Apexum	the Apexum Protocol	the tooth is treated by a standard root canal treatment, supplemented by Apexum Ablator protocol, in which the periapical lesion tissue is minced and removed through the root canal, in a minimally invasive fashion.
Apexum	Conventional endodontic procedure	the tooth is treated by a standard root canal treatment, supplemented by Apexum Ablator protocol, in which the periapical lesion tissue is minced and removed through the root canal, in a minimally invasive fashion.
Control	Conventional endodontic procedure	the tooth is subject to conventional endodontic procedure alone, (standard root canal treatment)

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Healing at 6-month follow-up, defined dichotomously by whether lesion is in the process of Healing or not, indicated by whether PAI score at 6 months is at 3 or below	6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Healing at 12-month follow-up.	12 months

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Titu Maiorescu University; 🇷🇴 Bucharest, Romania

Cabinet Stomatologic Dr Dan Dragomirescu; 🇷🇴 Timisoara, Romania