Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05290909
NCT05290909UnknownNot Applicable

The Effectiveness of Blended and Problem-based Learning to Improve the Geriatric Nursing of Critical Thinking and Ethical Competence Among Nursing Students

National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentStarted: February 15, 2022Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Moral distress scale

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Medical ecology is a highly uncertain and high-pressure environment. Nurses must use their thinking to make critical judgments and decisions in a short time. Since the outbreak of the Covid-19 epidemic, many universities have produced a lot of innovative inf teaching styles. With the reduction of budget and the evaluation of teaching quality, the blended learning model is gradually being valued by educators.

The aims of this study are to establish a teaching model that applies blended learning and problem-oriented teaching, and to explore the association and effectiveness of critical thinking and ethical competence of research subjects after this intervention in which shortens the gap in learning and practicing for increasing clinical nursing capabilities.

Detailed Description

Medical ecology is a highly uncertain and high-pressure environment. Nurses must use their thinking to make critical judgments and decisions in a short time. Since the outbreak of the Covid-19 epidemic, many universities have produced a lot of innovative inf teaching styles. With the reduction of budget and the evaluation of teaching quality, the blended learning model is gradually being valued by educators.

The aims of this study are to establish a teaching model that applies blended learning and problem-oriented teaching, and to explore the association and effectiveness of critical thinking and ethical competence of research subjects after this intervention in which shortens the gap in learning and practicing for increasing clinical nursing capabilities.

After the implementation of this protocol, the participants would increase the critical thinking and ethical competence of nursing students in geriatric nursing. Also, the teacher can self-review the teaching effect and analyze the actual situation of the students in the construction of ethical competency as a teaching reference to improve or revise teaching strategies.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •The research object of this project will be the students in the nursing class of a university (third year students), and the students who have taken 2 credits each of " Profession and Ethics"in two working class.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Students that have selected " Profession and Ethics" but do not wish to participate in this study

Arms & Interventions

The protocol of blended and problem-based learning

Experimental

The experimental group will accept the protocol of blended and problem-based learning in the professional ethics course, 2 hours /per week, for 18 weeks

Intervention: The protocol of blended and problem-based learning (Other)

The traditional problem-oriented teaching model

Active Comparator

The control group will accept the traditional problem-oriented teaching model in the professional ethics course, 2 hours /per week, for 18 weeks

Intervention: The traditional problem-oriented teaching model (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Moral distress scale

Time Frame: eighteen weeks after intervention(T1)

This scale is the earliest measurement tool developed in the United States. It can effectively quantify the degree of moral distress generated by nurses when performing care activities. There are 11 questions in total. It can be used to simultaneously measure the frequency of incidents of moral and ethical distress during work and the range of scores. On a scale of 1 (never) to 5 (always), it is also possible to further assess the density of subjects faced with ethically distressing events, with scores ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (many), and when the two are multiplied, which is expressed as the degree of moral and ethical distress. The lower the score, the lower the moral and ethical distress experienced by the nurse in the experience of clinical practice, but the higher the score, the more painful the feelings caused by the moral and ethical distress. higher.

The Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory(CTDI-CV)

Time Frame: eighteen weeks after intervention(T1)

This scale is a scale commonly used in education to evaluate critical thinking assessments. There are 18 items in total. The overall internal consistency and retest stability coefficient both exceed 0.8. It has good reliability and validity. The total score ranges from 18 to 108, with higher scores indicating greater critical thinking ability.

Nurses' Moral Courage Scale,NMCS

Time Frame: eighteen weeks after intervention(T1)

This scale is mainly used to measure the moral courage of clinical nurses' self-assessment. The scale consists of four dimensions and 21 items. They were: ethics (7 items), commitment to good patient care (5 items), compassion and genuine presence with patients (5 items), and ethical responsibility (4 items). Using the Likert 5-point scoring method, "completely disagrees with me" is 1 point, "somewhat disagrees with me" is 2 points, "somewhat agrees with me" is 3 points, "somewhat agrees with me" is 4 points, and "meets me" is 5 points. "Completely agree" is 5 points, and the total scale is 21 to 105 points. The higher the score, the greater the moral courage of the nurse.

The Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory(CTDI-CV)

Time Frame: Baseline (T0)

This scale is a scale commonly used in education to evaluate critical thinking assessments. There are 18 items in total. The overall internal consistency and retest stability coefficient both exceed 0.8. It has good reliability and validity. The total score ranges from 18 to 108, with higher scores indicating greater critical thinking ability.

Moral distress scale

Time Frame: Baseline (T0)

This scale is the earliest measurement tool developed in the United States. It can effectively quantify the degree of moral distress generated by nurses when performing care activities. There are 11 questions in total. It can be used to simultaneously measure the frequency of incidents of moral and ethical distress during work and the range of scores. On a scale of 1 (never) to 5 (always), it is also possible to further assess the density of subjects faced with ethically distressing events, with scores ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (many), and when the two are multiplied, which is expressed as the degree of moral and ethical distress. The lower the score, the lower the moral and ethical distress experienced by the nurse in the experience of clinical practice, but the higher the score, the more painful the feelings caused by the moral and ethical distress. higher.

Nurses' Moral Courage Scale,NMCS

Time Frame: Baseline (T0)

This scale is mainly used to measure the moral courage of clinical nurses' self-assessment. The scale consists of four dimensions and 21 items. They were: ethics (7 items), commitment to good patient care (5 items), compassion and genuine presence with patients (5 items), and ethical responsibility (4 items). Using the Likert 5-point scoring method, "completely disagrees with me" is 1 point, "somewhat disagrees with me" is 2 points, "somewhat agrees with me" is 3 points, "somewhat agrees with me" is 4 points, and "meets me" is 5 points. "Completely agree" is 5 points, and the total scale is 21 to 105 points. The higher the score, the greater the moral courage of the nurse.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Chia Jung Hsieh

Ph.D., RN, Associate Professor

National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials