Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06397053
NCT06397053CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Visceral Obesity in Mid-Low

Daorong Wang1 site in 1 country242 target enrollmentStarted: December 1, 2019Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
242
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
early postoperative problems

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Our team has previously published articles providing detailed descriptions of the steps involved in both RS and LS. All surgeries adhered to the total mesorectal excision (TME) principle. In RS, a surgeon employed the Da Vinci Xi surgical system featuring a five-port setup, while five physicians conducted LS with a similarly configured five-port approach. Both the RS and LS doctors are experienced. The surgeries were conducted according to standard procedures, and the RS group utilized totally robotic rectal resection.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Case Control
Time Perspective
Retrospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • (1) confirmed pathology of mid-to-low rectal cancer (within 10 centimeters from the anal margin); (2) availability of comprehensive pathological and computed tomography (CT) data; (3) presence of a diagnosis indicating visceral obesity.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Multiple tumor

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

early postoperative problems

Time Frame: 2019-2023

early postoperative problems

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Daorong Wang
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Daorong Wang

Dr

Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials