Tuberoplasty Versus Balloon Spacer
- Conditions
- Rotator Cuff Tears
- Registration Number
- NCT06735170
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Minnesota
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine bone-to-bone contact between the tuberosity as compared to a subacromial balloon spacer procedure. Using biplanar fluoroscopy to determine the three-dimensional (3D) motion of the shoulder compared pre-procedure to post-procedure, the investigators will be able to assess 1) the bone-to-bone contact of the tuberosity and acromion in the setting of a massive posterior superior rotator cuff tear 2) if the placement of a dermal allograft over the tuberosity does indeed decrease bone contact and 3) if the placement of a subacromial balloon spacer decreases bone-to-bone contact. Doing so will allow assessment of the relative contribution of the implant for arm elevation versus potential compensatory motion of increased scapulothoracic motion. The investigators will also be able to correlate this to patient-reported outcomes of pain and shoulder function.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- Massive irreparable rotator cuff tear involving the supraspinatus and infraspinatus.
- No involvement of the subscapularis.
- Centered humeral head on X-ray examination.
- Primary complaint of pain.
- History of prior surgery, including failed rotator cuff repair.
- Involvement of the subscapularis.
- Acromiohumeral distance less than 7 mm on upright anterior-posterior (AP) radiograph.
- Rotator cuff deemed repairable at the time of surgery.
- Patients younger than 65 years due to FDA clearance of the subacromial balloon spacer only for patients over 65
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method change in bone-to-bone contact between tuberosity and acromion presurgery, 6 months postop, 12 months postop degree of change in bone-to-bone contact between tuberosity and acromion as assessed using biplanar fluoroscopy
shoulder range of motion presurgery, 1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively quantitative measurement in degrees with a goniometer of shoulder motion in forward elevation, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation
single assessment numerical evaluation (SANE) of the shoulder presurgery, 1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively a validated tool providing a numerical score from 0-100 that assess shoulder function as subjectively reported by the subject. A higher score indicates superior shoulder function.
American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) score presurgery, 1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively a validated survey with possible scores from 0-100 that assesses shoulder function as reported by the subject. A higher score indicates superior shoulder function.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Minnesota
🇺🇸Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States