Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02630173
NCT02630173CompletedNot Applicable

Evaluation of Endodontic Status on Periodontal Healing of Concomitant Endodontic Periodontal Lesions

Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak0 sites28 target enrollmentStarted: May 1, 2014Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
28
Primary Endpoint
Improvement in periodontal parameters Probing depth

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Introduction:

To evaluate the effect of untreated endodontic infection on periodontal status in untreated non vital teeth with periapical radiolucency as compared to contralateral vital teeth. And also to evaluate the role of endodontic treatment on periodontal healing in successfully endodontically treated teeth with contralateral vital teeth.

Methods:

This study was performed in two parts. First part of this study was an observational cross sectional survey and second part was a clinical trial on patients selected from the survey.

Detailed Description

Title: EVALUATION OF ENDODONTIC STATUS ON PERIODONTAL HEALING OF CONCOMITANT ENDODONTIC PERIODONTAL LESIONS

INTRODUCTION:

Although deleterious effects of endodontic tissue on the periodontium are well documented, the converse effect of periodontal disease on pulp remains unclear. There is abundance of research on the avenues of communication but still many doubts exist. High prevalence of accessory canals has been seen but not all primary endodontic lesions drain through the periodontal ligament. Many endodontic lesions are more prone to drain through cortical bone rather than through the periodontal ligament. It may be because of the nature of periradicular lesions which initially try to expand horizontally through cancellous bone and then progressing vertically. Evidence also suggests that endodontically treated teeth lack the same proprioceptive capability as endodontically untreated teeth so they may be subjected to greater occlusal forces. More forces could enhance the propagation of fracture lines along the root surface, resulting in more periodontal attachment loss. Also teeth associated with either root perforations or fractures appear to follow periodontal drainage routes whereas lesions of primarily pulpal origin seem to remain localized or drain through cortical bone. Many explanations are provided, firstly periodontal ligament may be resistant to bacterial insult of endodontic origin, or injuries originating through mechanical trauma are faintly recognized, causing a subtle attachment loss occurring secondary to routine endodontic disease. Another explanation could be that the main or accessory canals might not be the solo and most important route of communication and endodontic infection might also proceed along cervically located dentinal tubules.

A group of retrospective and experimental studies in the past demonstrated the effect of endodontic infection on periodontal status and healing. A series of retrospective studies performed on single rooted teeth of periodontitis prone patients correlated endodontic infection with periodontal status in terms of pocket depth and attachment loss. Teeth with periapical radiolucency demonstrated deeper pockets and more radio graphic attachment loss as compared to a healthy tooth. Non surgical periodontal treatment with horizontal defects depicted reduced mean pocket depth reduction and increased radio graphic attachment loss in teeth with periapical pathology in comparison with endodontically intact tooth. Even multi rooted teeth with periapical destruction in periodontitis prone patients exhibited significantly greater mean probing depth compared to teeth without periapical destruction. Mandibular molars with periapical destruction showed ≥ 3 mm horizontal furcation depth. In all these studies periodontal parameters of teeth (either root filled or with a periapical radiolucency) were compared with an endodontically intact tooth also present in the patients without any consideration of quality of obturation.

Research has denoted that endodontic treatment influences the periodontal healing and periodontal status of tooth.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 69 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients older than or equal to18 years with more than 20 remaining teeth.
  • •Generalized chronic periodontitis was considered when ≥30% of sites were involved with clinical attachment loss (CAL) slight =1 or 2 mm, Moderate =3 or 4 mm, and Severe ≥5 mm
  • •Non vital tooth and contralateral vital tooth with PD ≥ 5 mm on at least one site.
  • •Non vital tooth confirmed by electric pulp test and cold test.
  • •Contralateral tooth with normal periapical conditions in the radiograph and with no evidence of root canal treatment and was vital as confirmed by electric pulp test and cold test.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients younger than 18 years
  • •Non vital tooth and contralateral vital tooth with mean PD>8 and<
  • •Endodontically treated teeth
  • •Unrestorable teeth
  • •Contralateral tooth having proximal carious lesions or was non vital.
  • •Inflammatory root resorption
  • •Fractured / Perforated roots
  • •Serious medical illness; Patients with uncontrolled or poorly controlled diabetes, unstable or life threatening conditions or requiring antibiotic prophylaxis (including infective endocarditis or prosthetic joint prophylaxis and immune compromising disorder)
  • •Pregnant mothers
  • •A history of recent periodontal therapy (with in previous 6 months)
  • •Teeth with established endodontic-periodontal lesion exhibiting less than 2 mm radiopaque bone between the periapical lesion and periodontal destruction, in which the periodontal probe reached the apex.

Arms & Interventions

Non vital teeth with apical radiolucency

Experimental

Endodontic treatment was performed in non vital teeth with periapical radiolucency. Local anesthesia was provided (2% Novocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine), isolation with rubber dam and standard access cavity preparation was done.Using 3 % sodium hypochlorite, canal negotiation was done & apical patency was achieved with #10 or #15K-files. Coronal flaring with # 2 and #3 Gates-Glidden drills was done.Calcium hydroxide was filled in the canals with the help of a lentulo spiral.At the second appointment,calcium hydroxide paste was removed and copious irrigation with 3% sodium hypochlorite was followed by 5.0 mL 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid with a final rinse of 5.0 mL of 3% sodium hypochlorite. The canals were obturated with gutta-percha and ZOE sealer.

Intervention: Scaling and root planing (Procedure)

Non vital teeth with apical radiolucency

Experimental

Endodontic treatment was performed in non vital teeth with periapical radiolucency. Local anesthesia was provided (2% Novocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine), isolation with rubber dam and standard access cavity preparation was done.Using 3 % sodium hypochlorite, canal negotiation was done & apical patency was achieved with #10 or #15K-files. Coronal flaring with # 2 and #3 Gates-Glidden drills was done.Calcium hydroxide was filled in the canals with the help of a lentulo spiral.At the second appointment,calcium hydroxide paste was removed and copious irrigation with 3% sodium hypochlorite was followed by 5.0 mL 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid with a final rinse of 5.0 mL of 3% sodium hypochlorite. The canals were obturated with gutta-percha and ZOE sealer.

Intervention: Endodontic treatment (Other)

Vital teeth

Active Comparator

Only scaling and root planing will be done in contralateral vital tooth with pocket depth >5mm .Non surgical periodontal treatment in the form of scaling and root planing was provided in minimum of two sessions using ultrasonic scaler (Satelec P5 Booster Suprasson) and hand instruments (Hu-friedy scalers and curettes).

Intervention: Scaling and root planing (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Improvement in periodontal parameters Probing depth

Time Frame: baseline to 6months

periodontal parameters pocket depth (in mm) was measured at baseline to 6 months with the help of calibrated manual periodontal probe.

Secondary Outcomes

  • plaque score(baseline to 6 months)
  • bleeding on probing(baseline to 6 months)
  • periapical score(baseline to 6 months)
  • attachment loss(baseline to 6 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Sanjay Tewari

Proffesor and Head

Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak

Similar Trials