MedPath

Coring Out Fistulectomy With Closure of Internal Sphincter Opening Versus Lay Open Fistulotomy and Primary Sphincter Repair in Transsphincteric Perianal Fistula

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Fistulectomy
Coring Out
Sphincter Repair
Internal Sphincter
Transsphincteric Perianal Fistula
Lay Open Fistulotomy
Registration Number
NCT06478615
Lead Sponsor
Ain Shams University
Brief Summary

This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of coring out fistulectomy with the closure of internal sphincter opening versus lay open fistulotomy (modified LIFT) and lay open fistulotomy and primary sphincter repair in trans-sphincteric perianal fistula

Detailed Description

Fistula-in-ano is a common medical problem affecting thousands of patients annually. Symptoms generally affect quality of life significantly, and they range from minor discomfort and drainage with resultant hygienic problems to sepsis. Different classifications have been put forward which categorize these Fistula into low or high simple or complex, or according to their anatomy inter-sphincteric, trans-sphincteric, and supra- sphincteric or extra-sphincteric.

Conventional laying-open technique in high perianal fistula may involve sacrifice of part or whole of the sphincter muscle impairing continence. A transposition technique for the management of high anal and anorectal fistulae is described by Mann and Clifton in 1985. The method involves re-routing the extrasphincteric portion of the track into an intersphincteric position with immediate repair of the external sphincter.

Coring-out fistulectomy is a type of sphincter-preserving procedure that enables accurate resection of the fistula tract alone and thus reduces the possibility of missing a secondary tract

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age more than 18 years old.
  • Both sexes.
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I, II.
  • Fistula in ano, Trans-sphincteric type
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with low perianal fistula.
  • Recurrent perianal fistula.
  • Associated anal conditions such as (piles, anal fissures, and rectal prolapse).
  • Patients with inflammatory bowel disease or tuberculosis.
  • Patients with acute perianal abscess.
  • Patients with major incontinence.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Incidence of recurrence of perianal fistula3 months postoperatively

Incidence of recurrence of perianal fistula was recorded and confirmed when an anal fistula or abscess is observed on any previously healed wound for 3 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Healing time3 months postoperatively

Healing was defined as cicatrization of all wounds without discharge at 3 months

Length of hospital stay1 week postoperatively

Length of hospital stay was recorded from admission till discharge from hospital.

Complications3 months postoperatively

Complications such as (blood loss, pain, bleeding, discharge, urinary retention, urgency, wound infection) were recorded.

Incidence of stool incontinence3 months postoperatively

Incidence of stool incontinence was recorded for 3 months.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ain Shams University

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

Ain Shams University
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.