Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06874829
NCT06874829Active, not recruitingNot Applicable

Post-activation Performance Enhancement in Multi- Vs Single-Joint Movements: a Comparative Study of BFR and EMS in Male Volleyball Athletes

Karabuk University1 site in 1 country15 target enrollmentStarted: February 10, 2025Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
15
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Service speed

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Investigators used a randomized controlled crossover design to compare the effect of blood flow restriction (BFR) and electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) protocols on post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) in multi-joint versus single-joint exercises. Participants took part in six test sessions 72 hours apart. In the BFR group, 50% of the arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) was used. In the EMS group, a 75 Hz current was applied. In the Low Resistance exercise group, only exercise was performed without any condition. Bench press (multi-joint) and triceps push-down (single-joint) exercises were used in the conditions.

Detailed Description

Participants took part in six test sessions 72 hours apart. All tests were performed between 2 and 4 pm to reduce the influence of circadian rhythms or fatigue on performance. Anthropometric measurements, 1 RM test, and grip strength and serving speed tests were determined before the practice session on the first day as a control condition. On the other six experimental days, players were randomly assigned to protocols (BFR, EMS, and LOW-LOAD) using software (http://www.randomizer.org). In the BFR group, 50% of the arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) was used. In the EMS group, a 75 Hz current was applied. In the Low Resistance exercise group, only exercise was performed without any condition. Bench press (multi-joint) and triceps push-down (single-joint) exercises were used in the conditions. In all protocols, participants performed a standardized warm-up protocol consisting of a 5-minute run at 9 km/h on a treadmill and a general warm-up consisting of 3 minutes of whole-body light stretching exercises. Following the warm-up and pre-exercise protocols, grip strength and service speed tests were performed with rest periods.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

Participants were strictly separated and think their intervention is the main intervention. The same is true for care providers. Outcome assessors were unaware of participant group status and were not allowed to ask correspondingly.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 30 Years (Adult)
Sex
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Being healthy
  • •Male volleyball athletes
  • •Willing to maintain the intervention for all sessions

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Being under 18 years old
  • •Having a chronic disease
  • •Contraindication for Electromyostimulation (EMS)
  • •Contraindication for Blood Flow Restriction (BFR)
  • •Contraindications for exercise

Arms & Interventions

Blood flow restriction

Active Comparator

In the BFR group, 50% of the arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) was used.Bench press (multi-joint) and triceps push-down (single-joint) exercises were used in the conditions.

Intervention: Blood Flow Restriction (Other)

Electrical muscle stimulation

Active Comparator

In the EMS group, a 75 Hz current was applied. Bench press (multi-joint) and triceps push-down (single-joint) exercises were used in the conditions.

Intervention: Electrical Muscle Stimulation (Other)

Low Load Resistance Exercise

Active Comparator

In the Low Resistance Exercise group, only exercise was performed without any condition (BFR or EMS. Bench press (multi-joint) and triceps push-down (single-joint) exercises were used in the conditions.

Intervention: Low-Load Resistance Exercise (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Service speed

Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Service speed will assess by standard radar apparatus (Net Playz Smart Pro Speed Radar, USA) and will record in km/h.

Hand Grip strength

Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Hand grip strength will assess by hand grip dynamometer (Takei 5,101, Tokyo, Japan) and will record in kg.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Karabuk University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Neslihan AKÇAY

Assoc. Prof. Dr.

Karabuk University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Post-Activation Performance Enhancement in... | Clinical Trial