Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolothotomy for Management of >3cm Renal Pelvis Stone

Phase 2

Completed

• Conditions: Renal Pelvis Stone >3cm
• Interventions: Procedure: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy; Procedure: percutaneous nephrolithotomy

• Registration Number: NCT01637337
• Lead Sponsor: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

Brief Summary

To compare the outcome of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with \>3cm renal pelvis stone.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2012-05
• Study First Submitted: 2012-07-03
• Study First Submitted QC: 2012-07-10
• Study First Posted: 2012-07-11
• Primary Completion: 2012-12
• Study Completion: 2013-01
• Status Verified: 2016-04
• Last Update Submitted: 2016-04-19
• Last Update Posted: 2016-04-20

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 60

Inclusion Criteria

• Adults with >3cm renal pelvis stone

Exclusion Criteria

• History of previous surgery on the target kidney
• Active UTI
• Coagulopathy

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
laparoscopic pyelolithotomy	laparoscopic pyelolithotomy	-
percutaneous nephrolithotomy	percutaneous nephrolithotomy	-

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Stone free rate	at least 6 month after surgery

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences; 🇮🇷 Shiraz, Fars, Iran, Islamic Republic of