NCT01637337
Completed
Phase 2
Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolothotomy for Management of >3cm Renal Pelvis Stone
ConditionsRenal Pelvis Stone >3cm
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Renal Pelvis Stone >3cm
- Sponsor
- Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
- Enrollment
- 60
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Stone free rate
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 10 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
To compare the outcome of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with >3cm renal pelvis stone.
Investigators
Alireza Aminsharifi
Assistant Professor of Urology
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Adults with \>3cm renal pelvis stone
Exclusion Criteria
- •History of previous surgery on the target kidney
- •Active UTI
- •Coagulopathy
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Stone free rate
Time Frame: at least 6 month after surgery
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 3
Evaluation of laparoscopic surgery success versus percutaneous surgery for kidney staghorn stoneIRCT20180625040232N5Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences68
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and low flouro Percutaneous NephrolithotomyRenal stone.Calculus of kidneyN20.0IRCT20210316050721N1Iran University of Medical Sciences35
Completed
Not Applicable
A Comparative Study Between Anterior and Posterior Pyelotomy in Transperitoneal Laparoscopic PyelolithotomyLarge Renal StoneNCT06394219Damascus University36
Completed
Phase 2
Comparing Pneumatic Versus Ultra-sonic Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Large Kidney StonesKidney StoneNCT02751281Isfahan University of Medical Sciences180
Completed
Not Applicable
Trial Comparing Dual Probe Ultrasonic Lithotripsy to a Single Probe Ultrasonic LithotripsyKidney StonesNCT00351351Indiana Kidney Stone Institute70