Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05390047
NCT05390047RecruitingNot Applicable

The International Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Registry (iSuSi)

University of Luebeck1 site in 1 country4,000 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2022Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
4,000
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Overall complication rate

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The entirely subcutaneous implantable defibrillator (S-ICD) (Emblem, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) was introduced as a new therapeutic alternative to the conventional transvenous ICD in 2009 and implantations are rapidly expanding since then.1 Implantation of the S-ICD seems to reduce implant-related perioperative complications such as pneumothorax, hematoma and cardiac tamponade.

The aim of this multicenter registry is thus to assess the outcome of patients following an S-ICD implantation in a real-world setting.

Detailed Description

The S-ICD has a CE mark and is FDA approved since 2012 and is mentioned as a potential therapy strategy in the current AHA guidelines on the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias.2 However, although implant-related complications seem to be reduced by the S-ICD in randomized controlled trials, the rate of inappropriate shocks remains high in S-ICD patients (10-13%).3-5 The most common reason for inappropriate shocks is cardiac oversensing, mostly due to T-wave oversensing or low amplitude of the subcutaneous signal, which not commonly found in patients with transvenous ICDs. Data on the role of the Defibrillation Threshold Testing (DFT), the rate of infectious complications (lead or device complications), the use of the S-ICD in children and adolescents, and the outcome of patients with an S-ICD according to their underlying cardiac substrate are sparse. The aim of this multicenter registry is thus to assess the outcome of patients following an S-ICD implantation in a real-world setting with a special focus on perioperative complication rate, the role of DFT testing in S-ICD, the use of the S-ICD in cohorts that are underrepresented in clinical studies (adolescents and geriatrics), the outcome and risk factors of ineffective, inappropriate and appropriate shocks and the differences in outcomes according to the underlying cardiac disease.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Retrospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 99 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Implantation of an S-ICD, regardless of the technique
  • At least 1 month of follow up
  • At least 1 post-implantation assessment, in accordance to the routine clinical practice of every center (e.g. in person visit or remote follow up)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Overall complication rate

Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years

combination of device related complications and inappropriate shocks

Rate of inappropriate shocks

Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years

Inappropriate therapies delivered by the devices

Rate of appropriate shocks

Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years

Appropriate therapies delivered by the devices

Secondary Outcomes

  • DFT impact(2 year)
  • Device-related complication rate(immediately after the intervention/procedure/surgery")
  • Role of Gender in primary outcomes(through study completion, an average of 2 year)
  • Rate of device upgrades(through study completion, an average of 2 year)
  • Rate of replacements(2 year)

Investigators

Sponsor
University of Luebeck
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Prof. Roland Richard Tilz

Prof. Dr. med. Roland Richard Tilz

University of Luebeck

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials