Treatment of Atraumatic Bone Marrow Edema With Denosumab and Teriparatide vs Placebo
- Conditions
- Bone Marrow Oedema SyndromeHigh Turnover Bone DiseaseQuality of Life
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT01734824
- Lead Sponsor
- Medical University of Vienna
- Brief Summary
The etiology of bone marrow edema (BME) is still uncertain. Several studies report therapeutic success with antiresorptive drugs.
This study investigates antiresorptive and osteoanabolic drugs versus placebo in BME
- Detailed Description
Patients are assigned to receive either denosumab 60mg sc (once) or placebo or daily teriparatide sc for three months or placebo.
MRI examinations at baseline and after three months will be performed. Serum bone turnover markers will be evaluated as well as QoL questionnaires.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- SUSPENDED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 90
- MRI diagnosed bone marrow edema
- any prior antiresorptive or osteoanabolic treatment
- any prior therapy with strontium ranelate
- Hyper-/hypocalcemia
- malignancies
- pregnancy
- and contraindication against denosumab or teriparatide
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Placebo Teriparatide Placebo Teriparatide daily subcutaneous teriparatide placebo injection Placebo Denosumab Placebo Denosumab one subcutaneous injection of denosumab placebo Denosumab Denosumab one subcutaneous injection of denosumab Teriparatide Teriparatide daily subcutaneous injection of teriparatide 20µg for three months
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Reduction/termination of bone marrow edema with antiresorptive and osteoanabolic drugs baseline - month 1 - month 3 MRI examination, fasting serum levels of bone turnover markers, QoL-questionnaire, VAS score
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Medical University Vienna - St. Vincent Hospital
🇦🇹Vienna, Austria