Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04522570
NCT04522570
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable

Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Cervical Metastases From Thyroid Carcinoma

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo1 site in 1 country84 target enrollmentDecember 14, 2020

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Thyroid Neoplasia
Sponsor
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo
Enrollment
84
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] of thermal ablation of thyroid carcinoma cervical lymph node metastases
Status
Active, not recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

This study will evaluate the clinical response and safety of ultrasound guided percutaneous thermal ablation of lymph node metastases from thyroid carcinoma as an alternative to surgical treatment.

The ablation of cervical lymph node metastases from differentiated thyroid carcinoma or medullary thyroid carcinoma will be directed to lesions larger than 0.8 cm, using ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA), laser ablation (LA) or cryoablation (Cryo) techniques, randomly assigned. Clinical and ultrasound monitoring will be carried out during 24 months, with examinations before the ablation procedure, immediately after including contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) when applicable, and B-mode, color Doppler and Shear-Wave elastography ultrasound follow up with 6, 12, and 24 months.

Detailed Description

Thyroidectomy is the main treatment of well differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Residual or recurrent cervical metastases are common (9-20% of patients during long-term follow up). Thermal ablation of cervical metastatic lymph nodes from thyroid carcinoma has been proposed in research centers as an option for the treatment of patients who remain with metastatic disease in cervical lymph nodes, despite thyroidectomy with or without neck dissection associated with radioiodine treatment. Potential advantages from percutaneous thermal ablation are related to less complication rates, less morbidity, possibility of outpatient treatment modality, and less global treatment costs when compared to the surgical approach. Aims of the study: 1. To evaluate safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided thermal ablation in the treatment of cervical lymph node metastases from differentiated thyroid carcinoma 2. To evaluate the best response to thermal ablation defined as lymph node reduction or volume stability after ablation 3. To evaluate the CEUS patterns of lymph nodes before and after ablation 4. To evaluate the elastography patterns of lymph nodes before and after ablation 5. To evaluate the tumor marker response after ablation 6. To evaluate the contribution of thermal ablation to decrease additional therapeutic procedures 7. To compare differences between LA, RFA and cryoablation in terms of complications, side effects and tolerability Patients with cervical metastatic lymph nodes from differentiated thyroid carcinoma or medullary thyroid carcinoma who meet the eligibility criteria and who have been determined to be an appropriate candidate for local ablation therapy will be offered enrollment into the study. Patients agreeing to participate will become subjects of the study if they read and sign an informed consent form. Treatment will be performed using three different ablation technologies (laser ablation, RFA or cryoablation) in a randomly assignment fashion. Subjects will have up to six simultaneous treated lesions larger than 0.8 cm diameter with positive fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Ultrasound (and CEUS when applicable) will be performed over 24 months follow up in order to evaluate efficacy. Baseline and follow-up data will be collected for each subject via a web-based electronic data collection tool. In case of recurrent disease treated by any ablative technique in patients who did not undergo previous neck dissection, a rescue neck dissection will be performed; in case of recurrent disease treated by any ablative technique in patients who underwent previous neck dissection, a new ablative technique approach will be considered.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
December 14, 2020
End Date
November 30, 2026
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Patients with fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAb)-proven metastatic cervical lymph nodes at levels I, II, III, IV, V, VI or VII from differentiated thyroid carcinoma or medullary thyroid carcinoma who underwent total thyroidectomy and subsequent radioiodine therapy, in case of differentiated thyroid carcinoma.
  • Patients considered high surgical risk candidate or patients who are informed about the ablation therapy and prefers it instead surgery;
  • Patients with metastatic cervical lymph nodes over 0.8 cm diameter and under 4.0 cm diameter; no more than 6 simultaneous cervical nodal metastases;
  • Cervical recurrences in previously lateral neck dissection patients for differentiated thyroid carcinoma or medullary thyroid carcinoma over 0.8 cm diameter.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age under 18 years
  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy;
  • Inconclusive or benign cytologic specimens;
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding;
  • Anaplastic or poor-differentiated thyroid carcinoma;
  • Partial thyroidectomy
  • Cervical tumors not considered to surgery (invading vessels, nerves, larynx or trachea);
  • Serious medical illness, including any of the following: uncontrolled angina, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event within 6 months prior to the baseline visit, uncontrolled congestive heart failure;
  • Participation in other studies that could affect the primary endpoint

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability] of thermal ablation of thyroid carcinoma cervical lymph node metastases

Time Frame: up to 4 weeks post-ablation

Evaluation of minor and major complication rates, immediately after ablation; and one- and four-weeks post-ablation by telephone call. Minor and major complication rates \[Designed as a safety issue: Yes\]. The safety endpoint for this study is to assess the incidence and severity of procedure or device-related adverse events, as reported by the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events - CTCAE V5. 2017 Version.

Evaluation of technical feasibility

Time Frame: immediately after the procedure

defined as the ability to target the nodule and to perform ablation as preoperatively planned

Secondary Outcomes

  • Evaluation of elastography pattern after thermal ablation therapy(24 months)
  • Evaluation of technical success(immediately after the procedure)
  • Evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound pattern after thermal ablation therapy(12 months)
  • Best response to the thermal ablation therapy(24 months)
  • Evaluation of tumor marker response(24 months)
  • Evaluation of additional therapies(24 months)
  • Outcomes among thermal ablation therapies(24 months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials