Mild Cognitive Impairment and Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Mild Cognitive Impairment

Interventions: Behavioral: CPAP adherence intervention
Behavioral: Attention control intervention

Registration Number: NCT01482351

Lead Sponsor: George Mason University

Brief Summary: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been linked to increased risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD), but little prospective evidence exists on the effects of OSA treatment in preclinical AD. The objective was to determine if CPAP treatment adherence, controlling for baseline differences, predicts cognitive and everyday function after 1 year in older adults with MCI and to determine effect sizes for a larger trial. The aim of the Mild Cognitive Impairment and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (Memories 1) trial was to determine whether CPAP treatment adherence, controlling for any baseline differences in OSA severity, ApoE4, and other previously identified demographic and patient factors, might predict cognitive and everyday function after 1 year in older adults with amnestic MCI.

Detailed Description: In this prospective open label clinical trial, primary inclusions were age 55-89 years and apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 10. Groups were: (1) MCI, OSA, and CPAP adherent (MCI+CPAP); (2) MCI, OSA, CPAP nonadherent(MCI-CPAP). There were 68 MCI+OSA participants at baseline, and 14 (21%) dropped out during the 1 year follow-up. At 1 year, n=54, with MCI+CPAP group n=29, and MCI-CPAP group n=25. Statistically significant improvements in psychomotor/cognitive processing speed in the MCI+CPAP group versus the MCI-CPAP group were observed at 1 year after adjustment for age, race, and marital status. There were small to moderate effect sizes (ES) for memory, attention, daytime sleepiness, and everyday function, favoring the MCI+CPAP group versus the MCI-CPAP group.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 54

Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
MCI/OSA/CPAP Adherent	CPAP adherence intervention	Device: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). This arm included those diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The diagnostic criteria for OSA was defined as an Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) score of greater than or equal to 10. CPAP was prescribed for nightly use. Mean CPAP use in this arm was equal to or greater than 4 hours per night over one year. CPAP adherence Intervention was provided by research staff.
MCI/OSA/CPAP Non-adherent	Attention control intervention	Device: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). This arm included those diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The diagnostic criteria for OSA was defined as an Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) score of greater than or equal to 10. CPAP was prescribed for nightly use. Mean CPAP use in this arm was less than 4 hours per night or CPAP use was withdrew for any reason over one year. Attention control intervention was provided by staff.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT)	Change from baseline at 6 months and 1 year	Attention/reaction time will assessed using the PVT. The participants sat in a closed and quiet examination room, without any auditory or visual disturbance. A 1-minute mock PVT demonstration was done prior to each test. The PVT visual display was held 14-22 inches from the subject's eyes. The participants were asked to either use the index finger or thumb of their dominant hand to respond to the PVT signals. The participants were instructed to maintain the fastest possible reaction times to a simple visual stimulus: a red light emitting diode displaying time in milliseconds in a window of the portable PVT device. We used number of lapses, defined as mean reaction time above 500 milliseconds (errors of omission) as the primary outcome. Lower score indicates better outcomes (Less lapses).
Mini Mental State Evaluation Exam (MMSE)	Change from baseline at 6 months and 1 year	Global cognitive function will be assessed using MMSE. It is a 30-item cognitive screen measuring orientation, registration, short-term memory, attention/concentration, language, and constructional capacity. Summary score will be used as a measure of global cognitive function. Total score ranges from 0 to 30, equal to and above 24 is normal (better outcome), less than 21 indicates increasing odds of dementia (worse outcome).
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R)	Change from baseline at 6 months and 1 year	Memory (immediate and delayed recall) will be assessed using HVLT-R. HVLT-R has been used in elders with Alzheimer's Disease and takes 10 minutes to complete. Total score ranges from 0 to 60, a higher score indicates a better memory (better outcome).
Stroop Color and Word Test (SCW)	Change from baseline at 6 months and 1 year	Attention will be measured using SCW. We used the Golden and Freshwater's (2002) version. This version provides paper stimuli for each trial: in the first, columns of the words"red""blue" and "green" are printed in black ink (Word Reading; W); in the second, columns of the same words are printed in red, blue, or green ink (Color Naming; C); in the third, the words "red" "blue" and "green" are printed in a colored ink (red, blue or green) that does not match the word (Color-Word; CW). Participants read each page aloud as quickly as possible for 45 seconds and receive a score for each trial representing the number of items correctly read aloud. The Interference T-score is obtained by first calculating a deviation score by subtracting a predicted CW score from the obtained raw CW score (in 45s). The obtained deviation score is then converted to an Interference T-score. Lower T scores(T\<40) in the Interference condition show reductions in inhibitory control.
Digit Symbol Subtest (DS)	Change from baseline at 6 months and 1 year	The Digit Symbol subtest (DS) from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-R) was used to measure psychomotor/cognitive processing speed. An age-adjusted total scaled score was used for analysis. The adjusted total score ranges from -5.7 to+27. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]	Change from baseline at 6 months and 1 year	Daytime sleepiness be assessed using ESS. The ESS asks the respondent to rate the likelihood of falling asleep in eight specific situations using a four-point Likert scale ranging from never dozing to high chance of dozing. The scale significantly correlates with the frequency of apneas and is a clinical and research standard for the assessment of daytime sleepiness. The total score ranges from 0 to 24, a higher score indicates higher chance of daytime sleepiness (worse outcome).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Functional Outcomes Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ)	Change from baseline at 6 months and 1 year	Everyday function will be assessed using FOSQ. It is a 30-item Likert-scale, self-report, disease-specific functional status measure written at the 4th grade level. The total score ranges from 0 to 120, a higher score indicates a better outcome.
Everyday Function Outcome: Everyday Cognition (E-Cog)	Change from baseline at 6 months and 1 year	This informant-rated composes of multiple subscales, to evaluate cognitively based functional abilities in older adults. The factor structure of Everyday Cognition was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis, which supported a 7-factor model including 1 global factor and 6 domain-specific factors (Everyday Memory, Language, Visuospatial Abilities, Planning, Organization, and Divided Attention). The total mean score ranges from 0 to 57. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR)	Change from baseline at 1 year	Cognitive ability will be assessed and staged using CDR. It contains 6 items (memory, orientation, judgement and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, personal care), and each item ranges from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 18, a higher score indicates a worse outcome. We observed the change of CDR score from baseline to 1-year follow up. Improved on CDR was defined as a lower CDR score compared to baseline. Reference group is unimproved, defined as worsened (higher) CDR or unchanged CDR compared to baseline.
Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Clinicians' Global Impression of Change Scale (ADCS-CGIC)	Change from baseline at 1 year	Global change (progression) will be assessed using ADCS-CGIC at 1 year. It has 8 categories as markedly improved, moderately improved, minimally improved, not changed, minimally worse, moderately worse, markedly worse, missing response.

Trial Locations

Locations (3): Abington Memorial Hospital
🇺🇸
Abington, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pennsylvania
🇺🇸
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
George Mason University
🇺🇸
Fairfax, Virginia, United States