Is the Mines Modified PERFECT Scheme (MMPS) a Valid Tool for Assessing PFM Function?
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 22
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- PERFECT Scheme
研究概览
简要总结
When performing our tests, we received verbal/written informed consent from all subjects prior to performing an internal/external testing. The subjects were cisgender females with no preexisting pelvic floor conditions noted. The subjects were assessed in two separate areas with a different experimenter testing the same subject. The subject was first tested with Laycock and Jerwood PERFECT Scheme by one experimenter and the same subject was then tested after 5 minutes rest with the MMPS by a separate experimenter. The results of each test were kept from both experimenters and the data was kept on a separate personal laptop. After testing was complete, the data was taken and provided to a professional statistician to be able to determine the validity of the MMPS, when compared to the Laycock and Jerwood PERFECT Scheme.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Diagnostic
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •healthy individuals with no previous pelvic floor impairments -
排除标准
- •pelvic floor impairments
研究组 & 干预措施
PERFECT Scheme
干预措施: Mines Modified PERFECT Scheme (Diagnostic Test)
Mines Modified PERFECT Scheme
干预措施: Mines Modified PERFECT Scheme (Diagnostic Test)
结局指标
主要结局
PERFECT Scheme
时间窗: 8 months
次要结局
未报告次要终点