NCT07664098Not yet recruitingNot Applicable
Assessment of Vestibular Shifted Flap Versus Conventional Flap on Ridge Augmentation in Patients With Anterior Maxillary Bony Deficiency: a Randomized Control Trial
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Enrollment
- 24
- Locations
- 1
Study Overview
Brief Summary
two groups of patients both have alveolar bone deficiency in anterior maxilla, one group will be subjected to khoury bone augmentation with conventional flap the other with vestibular shifted flap
Detailed Description
The procedure begins with preoperative preparation, including patient positioning in a semi supine position with appropriate head support, induction of local anesthesia, and meticulous surgical site sterilization.
- Full thickness Vestibular flap and 2 horizontal releasing incision are made (Key Concept: The vestibular shifted flap provides additional flap length by translating vestibular mucosa coronally while preserving keratinized tissue and blood supply) in a group and conventional flap in the other group
- Flap elevation: Full thickness flap in the Donor site
- Using piezoelectric device, thin cortical bone blocks (1-1.5 mm thick) are harvested.
- Blocks are carefully shaped into flat "plates."
- The shell Graft placed, adapted and fixed with microscrews to restore desired horizontal dimension
- The space between the host bone and the fixed cortical plates is filled with bone particles.
- Tension free bilayered suturing
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Single (Participant)
Masking Description
This trial is considered a randomized single blind clinical trial due to:
- The participants will be blinded to the technique that will be used during the surgical procedure.
- The operator will not be blinded for both techniques during the surgical procedure as the two techniques are different.
- The outcome assessor cannot be blinded.
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 21 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Adult patients with horizontal bone defects in anterior maxilla
- •Mixed dentition age (21-75)
- •Good periodontal health
- •Non smokers
- •Both genders males and females will be included
Exclusion Criteria
- •Uncontrolled systemic disease
- •General contraindications to surgery.
- •Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol could not be properly followed.
Investigators
Piatrece Amgad Wadeea
principle investigator
Cairo University
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of Modified Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Technique and Advanced Platelet Rich Fibrin Plus with Low Level Laser Therapy in the treatment of receding gumsCTRI/2026/01/100635Dr Ankita Chakraborty16
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3 4
Comparing Two Vestibuloplasty Techniques for Improved Denture Stability in Patients with Severe Mandibular Ridge Resorption: A Clinical StudyCTRI/2024/05/067902Dr Rohit Kumar Singh20
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
Comparison of two surgical techniques in the treatment of receding gumsCTRI/2025/12/098425JSS Dental college and Hospital24
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison of skeletal and dentoalveolar changes associated with two miniscrews versus for miniscrews assisted rapid palatal expansion using cone beam computed tomographyCTRI/2025/07/091453Anisha Rajan C M20
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A Study Comparing Two Minimally Invasive Surgical Methods for Treating Multiple Gum Recessions.CTRI/2026/02/103776Dr Rizia Parvin20