MedPath

Tracking Our Lives Study

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Health Behavior
Mental Health Wellness 2
Eating Disorders
Interventions
Other: Dietary self-monitoring
Registration Number
NCT04052529
Lead Sponsor
University of Michigan
Brief Summary

College women are at risk for eating disorders, which have profound health impacts. Cross-sectional studies have shown that the use of dietary self-monitoring is associated with eating disorder risk among college students. However, causality cannot be established with cross-sectional studies.

This study utilizes a randomized controlled trial design to examine how the use of a popular dietary self-monitoring smartphone application impacts college females' well-being, including eating disorder risk. We hypothesize those who are randomized to dietary self-monitoring will have a greater increase in eating disorder risk compared to the control group.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria
  • University of Michigan Ann Arbor undergraduate student
  • Daily access to a smartphone
  • Female gender
  • At least 18 years of age
  • Fluent in English
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Self-reported history of any medical condition that impacts the types or amount of food eaten
  • Self-reported recent use of dietary self-monitoring
  • Self-reported history of an active or past eating disorder
  • Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire Short Form (EDE-QS) score ≥ 2, indicating high eating disorder risk
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
InterventionDietary self-monitoringParticipants are instructed to use a popular dietary self-monitoring application on their smartphone for one month.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Eating Disorder Risk30 days

Measured via survey using the validated SCOFF questionnaire which consists of five questions. Each question is a yes/no and a yes receives one point with a total score ranging from 0-5. Higher scores indicate higher risk. Modified to ask about pounds instead of stone as a measure of weight.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Weight perception30 days

Assessed using two questions on a survey pertaining to BMI category and weight.

Dietary Intake30 days

Single item survey questions adapted from the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System

Weight Stigma30 days

Measured via survey using five single item questions.

Weight30 days

Blind weights taken on research grade laboratory scale.

Anxiety30 days

State anxiety as measured via survey using the short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. The scale consists of 6 questions with a range of scores 1-4 for each question. Three positive questions are reverse coded and scores are added together with higher scores indicating higher state anxiety.

Physical Activity30 days

Single item survey questions adapted from the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System and an open ended question for amount of time physically active.

Weight-Related Self-Monitoring30 days

Measured via survey that includes single item measures asking about physical activity self-monitoring and self-weighing frequency.

Body Image30 days

Assessed via survey using the validated 6 question Body Image States Scale (BISS). Scores are the mean of the six items, three of which are reverse coded. Higher scores mean better body image states.

Depression Symptoms30 days

Measured via survey using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised (CESD-R-10). The CESD-R-10 is a 10 item scale with each question having the possibility of a score 0-3. Two questions are reverse coded, then scores from each question are added to give an overall score. Higher scores indicate more depressive symptoms.

Body changing intentions30 days

Assessed using single item question on a survey asking how, if at all, participants wanted to change their body.

Social Media Use30 days

Use of common social media sites assessed using five single item measures on a survey.

Subjective Quality of Life30 days

Assessed using the Brunnsviken Brief Quality of Life Scale (BBQ) on a survey. The BBQ has 12 questions, each ranging from 0-4. Higher scores indicate higher subjective quality of life.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Michigan

🇺🇸

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath