Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01163136
NCT01163136
Completed
Not Applicable

Decision Making in Serious Pediatric Illness

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia1 site in 1 country358 target enrollmentJuly 2010

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Parental Decision Making for Seriously Ill Children
Sponsor
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Enrollment
358
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Parents' reprioritized goals
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This study will look at a cohort of parents whose children are confronting life-threatening illnesses in intensive care, palliative care, and complex care settings, to test whether parents with higher levels of hopeful patterns of thinking are subsequently more likely a) to change the "level of care" order status of their child (as an important and demonstrable example of adapting goals); b) to reprioritize goals for the child when they are reassessed regarding goals ; and c) to report a higher degree of achieving self-defined 'good parent' attributes.

Detailed Description

Parents making medical decisions for a child living with a life-threatening condition confront, sometimes repeatedly, an extremely daunting task: how to decide when to set aside the therapeutic goal of cure or of life prolongation and instead prioritize the goals of comfort or quality of life. This study will look at a cohort of parents whose children are confronting life-threatening illnesses in intensive care, palliative care, and complex care settings, to test whether parents with higher levels of hopeful patterns of thinking are subsequently more likely a) to change the "level of care" order status of their child (as an important and demonstrable example of adapting goals); b) to reprioritize goals for the child when they are reassessed regarding goals ; and c) to report a higher degree of achieving self-defined 'good parent' attributes. We hypothesize that parents with higher levels of hopeful patterns of thinking subsequently will be: More likely to enact a limit of intervention order. More likely, upon explicit formal reassessment, to reprioritize goals for the child. More likely to report a higher degree of achieving self-defined 'good parent' attributes.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 2010
End Date
June 2017
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Parents of children who are patients at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) admitted to the neonatal, pediatric, or cardiac intensive care unit (NICU, PICU, or CICU), or who have been referred to the Pediatric Advanced Care Team (PACT) for palliative care services. A patient is eligible when the patient's attending physician considers it likely that parents will have major treatment decisions to make for their child within the coming 12 to 24 months.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Non English-speaking parents

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Parents' reprioritized goals

Time Frame: up to 2 years

Parents, when interviewed every 4 months for up to 2 years, are asked what the goals of care are for their child, and if the priority of those goals has changed.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Parents' self-defined 'good parent' attributes(up to 2 years)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials