Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Obese Women After Cesarean: a Pilot Randomized Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 120
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Number of Participants With Composite Surgical Site Infection (SSI) or Other Wound Complication.
研究概览
简要总结
Surgical site infections (SSIs) complicate 5 - 12% of cesareans. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) - a closed, sealed system that applies negative pressure to the wound surface - has been used to treat open wounds since the late 1990s. Experimental evidence suggests NPWT promotes wound healing by removing exudate, approximating the wound edges, and reducing bacterial contamination. Although effectiveness of prophylactic NPWT is biologically plausible and non-randomized studies suggest benefit in reducing SSIs, good quality data is lacking. The objective of this pilot randomized controlled trial of 120 patients to test the hypothesis that prophylactic NPWT will reduce SSIs and other wound complications after cesarean in obese women. The investigators will randomly assign obese women undergoing cesarean delivery to Standard dressing or prophylactic NPWT with the PICO system after skin closure. The primary outcome will be a composite of superficial or deep SSIs per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria and other wound complications (separation, hematoma, seroma) after cesarean.
Secondary outcomes will include wound dehiscence (≥2 cm); hematoma; seroma; composite of wound complications; patient pain and satisfaction scores; physician office visit or emergency department (ED) visits for SSIs; and hospital readmission for wound complications.
详细描述
Overview of the Proposed Trial
This will be a pilot randomized controlled trial. The investigators chose a randomized controlled trial, the 'gold standard' of clinical research design, with the goal of obtaining the highest quality evidence to inform clinical practice. Randomly allocating subjects to different interventions minimizes selection bias and results in groups that are comparable with regards to important confounding variables, both measured and unmeasured. Additionally, the broad inclusion criteria, simplicity of the interventions, and evaluation of effects of typical use of prophylactic NPWT make this a pragmatic trial. The investigators will follow the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines in the conduct and reporting of this trial. We will use computer-generated block randomization stratified by study site and BMI category to assign participants to the two interventions. All subjects will receive standard infection prevention measures including skin antisepsis and weight-adjusted prophylactic antibiotics. Analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle. The use of broad inclusion criteria and intention-to-treat analysis will allow a more conservative estimate of the effect of prophylactic NPWT and allow a better estimate of effectiveness and public health implications of practice change than would pure estimate of efficacy alone.
Conduct of the Trial Recruitment of study subjects: All women admitted to the labor and delivery units of the participating medical centers will be screened against inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible subjects will be approached by trained research staff for written consent to participate in the study. Subjects will be randomized only when the decision is made for cesarean delivery.
Randomization and allocation concealment: Enrolled subjects will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to NPWT or standard care using a computer-generated random sequence generated by the study statistician. A subject's group assignment will be revealed only after the decision is made to perform cesarean delivery.
Blinding: Although blinding of both subjects and physicians would be ideal, blinding is not possible in this trial. We will minimize systematic bias by applying the same standard infection prevention measures in all patients at each site. Further, the research personnel collecting outcomes data will be blinded to the group assignments of the subjects after the standard dressing or NPWT device have been removed. Importantly, diagnosis of the primary outcome will be objectively reviewed centrally by the PI in a blinded fashion using to CDC criteria.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Gestational age ≥23weeks
- •BMI≥30 at the time of delivery
- •Planned or unplanned cesarean delivery (procedure in which NPWT is being tested)
排除标准
- •Non-availability for postoperative follow-up (follow-up is needed to ascertain study outcomes)
- •Contraindication to NPWT applicable to women undergoing cesarean (device will not be used in patients with contraindications): Pre-existing infection around incision site, Bleeding disorder, Therapeutic anticoagulation, Allergy to any component of the dressing (e.g. silicone, adhesive tape)
结局指标
主要结局
Number of Participants With Composite Surgical Site Infection (SSI) or Other Wound Complication.
时间窗: 30 days
Superficial or deep SSIs or other wound complications (separation, hematoma, seroma) after cesarean. SSI will be defined according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) criteria as infections at the surgical site occurring within 30 days of cesarean delivery, and classified as superficial, deep, or organ/space occupying.
次要结局
- Number of Participants With Any COMPONENT of SSI or Composite Wound Complication(30 days)
- Pain Score on a 0 to 10 on Likert Scale(Postoperative days 2)
- Number of Participants With Positive Wound Culture(30 days)
- Number of Participants With Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus.(30 days)
- Number of Participants With Any Prophylactic Negative Pressure-related Adverse Events.(30 days)
