A Prospective Non-interventional Study in Overactive Bladder (OAB) Patients Prescribed Betmiga® as Part of Routine Clinical Practice
- Conditions
- Urgency IncontinenceUrinary Bladder OveractiveOveractive BladderUrologic DiseasesUrinary Bladder Diseases
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT02320773
- Lead Sponsor
- Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd.
- Brief Summary
A study to understand the impact of Betmiga® on patients quality of life, satisfaction with treatment, how long patients remain on treatment, patterns of healthcare resource utilisation, and safety as prescribed by the physicians in routine clinical practice.
- Detailed Description
Single arm, hybrid model study, observing patients on Betmiga under conditions of routine clinical practice, with some element of retrospective data collection 2 years prior to enrolment of the study
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 863
- Patients who have been diagnosed with OAB symptoms at Visit 1 of this study. OAB is defined by the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) 2010 joint report as urinary urgency, with or without urinary incontinence, usually with frequency and nocturia, with no proven infection or other obvious pathology.
- Patients whose physician has made the decision to prescribe Betmiga® as part of routine clinical practice and who are about to start treatment.
- Patients who are currently taking Betmiga®.
- Contraindication(s) as per the Betmiga® Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 1. OAB patients taking Betmiga® Betmiga® OAB patients whose physician has made the decision to prescribe Betmiga® as part of routine clinical practice and who are about to start treatment
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline in QoL based on the OAB-q subscales Baseline up to 12 months post-baseline Quality of life (QoL) based on the Overactive bladder questionnaire (OAB-q) subscales
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline in patient treatment satisfaction based on TS-VAS Baseline up to 12 months post-baseline Based on Treatment Satisfaction Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS)
Change from baseline in QoL based on the EQ-5D-5L subscales and WPAI:SHP Baseline up to 12 months post-baseline QoL based on Work Productivity Activity Index:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) and EUROQOL 5-DIMENSIONS (EQ5D)
Summary of utilisation of healthcare resources related to the management of OAB From enrollment to end of study (up to 12 months) Overactive bladder (OAB) healthcare resources are captured by the investigator and include: healthcare visits, medical interventions, number of incontinence pads used in last 7 days, invasive/surgical treatments of OAB symptoms and any other investigations of OAB (including clinical interpretation if available)
Frequency summary of disease progression From enrollment to end of study (up to 12 months Disease progression is defined by occurrence of invasive/surgical treatment of OAB symptoms during the study. Overactive Bladder (OAB) treatments include e.g. Botulinum toxin type A, Sacral Neural Stimulation (SNS), Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS)
Change from baseline in incontinence status during the study Baseline up to 12 months post-baseline Safety assessed by recording of AEs and ADRs during the study From enrollment to end of study (up to 12 months) Adverse Events (AEs), Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)
Summary of prescription status to assess treatment patterns and persistence with treatment Baseline up to 12 months post-baseline This composite summary includes the following items:
* Number and percentage of patients who switched treatment, and to what treatment they were switched.
* Number and percentage of patients who stopped treatment and reasons associated with discontinuation.
* Number of treatment days on current treatment.
* Time from treatment initiation to discontinuation or switching to another treatment.
* Time from treatment initiation to prescription of additional oral OAB treatment and reasons for combination treatment.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (60)
Site CZ42009 UROMEDA s. r. o.
🇨🇿Brno, Czechia
Site CZ42003 Fakultni nemocnice Brno-Bohunice
🇨🇿Brno, Czechia
Site CZ42006 Hospital Kyjov
🇨🇿Kyjov, Czechia
Site CZ42002 Fakultni nemocnice Kralovske Vinohrady
🇨🇿Praha 10, Czechia
Site CZ42007 MEDICON a.s.
🇨🇿Praha 4, Czechia
Site CZ42008 Oblastni nemocnice Pribram
🇨🇿Příbram, Czechia
Site CZ42004 Krajská nemocnice Tomáše Bati
🇨🇿Zlín, Czechia
Site DK45003 Sygehus Vendsyssel, Frederikshavn
🇩🇰Frederikshavn, Denmark
Site DK45004 Regionshospitalet Herning
🇩🇰Herning, Denmark
Site GR30002 University Hospital of Crete
🇬🇷Heraklion, Crete, Greece
Scroll for more (50 remaining)Site CZ42009 UROMEDA s. r. o.🇨🇿Brno, Czechia