The Impact of Nursing Interventions Based on Uncertainty In Illness Theory on Uncertainty, Hopelessness, Coping And Adaptation for Care Givers Of Children With Cancer

Brief Summary

Detailed Description

Cancer defines a group of diseases that arise from the uncontrolled proliferation and spread of abnormal cells. The prevalence of cancer before the age of 15 years is 110-150 million. Every year, more than 150,000 people in the World are newly diagnosed, and over 10,000 children in America are diagnosed with cancer for the first time. It is reported that 2500-3000 new cases of childhood cancer are expected to be seen in our country, Turkey, annually. Childhood cancer is a major stressor for family. They are at risk for developing psychosocial problems during the course of disease and its long and stressful treatment. And uncertainty is one of these problems which they live. Uncertainty arises when "the decision maker can not give a definite value to a certain event or situation" or "can not predict the accuracy of the results". Uncertainty refers to the inability to identify, interpret and predict the disease-related condition/event. Uncertainty can have positive or negative affects to child and family according the meaning and coping of uncertainty. Mishel is the first nurse theorist who mentioned uncertainty in illness in the aspect of nursing as a theory. In her theory, nursing interventions can help care giver to cope with or adapt the uncertainty. Nursing interventions should contain the main domains of such as communication, education, supporting, being reliable health care professional for parents. In this study, 46 care givers of children with cancer from two different university hospitals in Turkey. They were assigned group by using closed envelops that contain the letter of E(experimental) or C(control). Prior to study, sample size for each group calculated according to effect size (d=0,20), power (.80), alfa error (.05) and it was found 42 for all group. To avoid possible sample problems can be seen during to study (such as do not want to continue the stud etc), sample was improved %10 and sample number were decided 46 care giver in total. During the study while 18 care giver (9 from experimental, 9 from control group) finished the study, we calculated real effect size of our study and it was foun 0.24 and according to it we calculated sample size again and it was 30 in total. So we decided to continiue our study with 46 participants. Experimental group received nursing intervention according to protocol. It contained 6 modules (total 10 personal education session) that were developed based on Theory and literature. The aim of this intervention was to control/solve the antecedents of uncertainty and to affect appraisal of uncertainty in a positive way so care givers could improve the coping and adaptation of uncertainty. Control group received routine nursing intervention that was given normally for hospitals to avoid bias and ethical problems. Data was collected using information form (information about participant, parents and children), three scales (Turkish Version of Parents' Perception Uncertainty in Illness Scale: Parent/Child Form, Beck's Hopelessness Scale, Coping and Adaptation Process Scale). Scales validation and reliability studies were made for Turkish population.

Primary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes

• More coping and adaptation(At the end of 4 week.)
• Less hopelessness(At the end of 4 week.)