Effectiveness of Matched or Unmatched Cervical and Thoracic Manipulations on Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial Involving the CTDT (The EMU Manipulation Study)
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Neck Pain
- Sponsor
- University of Hartford
- Enrollment
- 40
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- pain with motion
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of two spinal manipulations in adults between the ages of 18-65 based on the results of a non-invasive clinical test. The main question it aims to answer is: • Does matched or unmatched region of manipulation based on the CTDT result in greater reduction of pain levels and improvement in range of motion in adults with neck pain compared to unmatched manipulations? Participants will be asked to:
- rate their pain with neck movement, complete brief questionnaires about their pain,
- have their neck range of motion measured,
- perform a test known as the cervico-thoracic differentiation test (CTDT),
- receive either a cervical or thoracic manipulation,
- repeat the range of motion measurements.
- A second session will occur 7-10 days later where questionnaires and range of motion measures will be repeated.
Researchers will compare the effects of manipulation matched to CTDT test result to individuals in the unmatched CTDT manipulation group to see if the CTDT may indicate which region will provide a greater treatment effect for individuals with neck pain.
Investigators
Brian Swanson
Principle investigator, associate professor
University of Hartford
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •between the ages of 18 and 65,
- •must report neck pain with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) greater than or equal to 3/10.
Exclusion Criteria
- •History of motor vehicle accident (MVA) within the past 6 months,
- •hypertension greater than or equal to 160/100,
- •non-mechanical neck pain (pain that is not reproducible with movement),
- •any past or present history of cancer,
- •upper motor neuron (CNS) lesion symptoms ( a positive Clonus sign, Babinski sign, or hyperreflexia of DTR's),
- •any infection that originates from the spine
- •Current confirmed or suspected pregnancy, or recent postpartum (6 mos),
- •known osteoporosis,
- •rheumatoid arthritis,
- •long-term use of corticosteroids (\>6mos),
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
pain with motion
Time Frame: immediate post intervention, 7-10 days
pain occurring with the participants most provocative cervical motion as measured on a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS)
Secondary Outcomes
- range of motion(immediate post intervention, 7-10 days)
- pain at rest(immediate post intervention, 7-10 days)
- neck disability index(7-10 days post intervention)