跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/06/089052
CTRI/2025/06/089052尚未招募不适用

A Prospective Comparative Study To Asses The Efficacy Of between The Fingers Grip With The Conventional Pen Holding Grip To Hold An endotracheal Tube For orotracheal Intubation Using C Mac Videolaryngoscope

Dr B R Ambedkar Medical college1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 64 人开始时间: 2026年10月4日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
64
试验地点
1
主要终点
1.To measure time required for endotracheal intubation for each grip using CMAC videolaryngoscopy

研究概览

简要总结

It has been documented that time taken for intubation is usually longer especially with angulatedblade as easy visualization of glottis does not guarantee easy passage of ET tube into larynx andthis is aptly termed as “Laryngoscopy paradox".

Modified grip i.e., between the finger method of endotracheal tube holding allowed the operator tochange the curvature of the ETT as it neared the glottic opening in a dynamic fashion duringlaryngoscopy thus, the tip can be manoeuvred forward and anteriorly, providing better control andalignment than fixed curvature in the conventional pen holding method of endotracheal tube.

In this study we aim to compare, modified between-the- finger grip with that of conventional pen-holding method of endotracheal tube for orotracheal intubation using C -MAC Video laryngoscope.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Computer generated randomization
盲法
Not Applicable

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • •18 to 60 years and American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status(ASA- PS) I and II patients. 2.Patients with Mallampati grades (MP) 1,2, 3.

排除标准

  • •1.Refusal to participate in the study, Patients with cormack Lehane (CL) grades 3b ,4 2.patients with an anticipated difficult airway, history of difficult airway in previousdocuments, head and neck pathology, and haemodynamic instability.
  • •patients with cervical spine instability , reactive airway , gastric reflux , cerebralhemorrhage will be excluded.

结局指标

主要结局

1.To measure time required for endotracheal intubation for each grip using CMAC videolaryngoscopy

时间窗: from base line to30 min

2.To compare the requirement of external assistance in the form of thebackward upward rightward pressure manoeuvre (BURP) to performendotracheal intubation

时间窗: from base line to30 min

次要结局

  • 1.Comparing the number of attempts for endotrachealintubation for each grip and use of external aids such asbougie and stylet(2.The variations in the haemodynamic parameters heart rate(HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP)) in the two groups.)

研究者

申办方类型
Private medical college

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

A Comparative Study To Asses The Efficiency Of... | 临床试验