Iodixanol Versus Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic Imaging of Abdomen/Pelvis
- Registration Number
- NCT01376089
- Lead Sponsor
- GE Healthcare
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare overall patient comfort profile between the Iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM), iodixanol 320 mg I/mL, and a Low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM), iopamidol 370 mg I/mL in patients undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) imaging of the abdomen/pelvis.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 304
- The subject is over 18 years old.
- Subjects are referred to undergo a CECT imaging of the abdomen/pelvis as part of their routine clinical care.
- The subject has known allergies to iodine or any prior history of adverse reaction to iodinated CM.
- The subject received another administration of CM within 24 hours prior to baseline or is scheduled to receive one within the 24 hour follow-up period.
- The subject is pregnant.
- The subject is taking metformin (e.g., Glucophage®) but is not willing or unable to discontinue at the time of the study procedure.
- The subject manifests thyrotoxicosis or is on dialysis.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Arm 1-Iodixanol Iodixanol - Arm 2-Iopamidol Iopamidol -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Frequency of Subjects With Moderate/Severe Discomfort When Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis. Within 10 minutes post contrast administration Number of subjects experiencing any moderate (score of 4 - 7) to severe (score 8 - 10) discomfort for cold or heat or pain between Iodixanol and Iopamidol.
Frequency of Subjects With Moderate / Severe Discomfort When Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis. Within 10 minutes post contrast administration. Number of subjects experiencing moderate (score of 4 -7) to severe (score of 8 - 10) discomfort for cold, heat or pain between Iodixanol and Iopamidol.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of Overall Image Quality Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis. Ten minutes post contrast administration. Overall Image Quality rated as 'Excellent, Adequate or Poor' by radiologists blinded to the contrast administration.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
GE Healthcare
🇺🇸Princeton, New Jersey, United States