A Randomised Pilot Study to Assess Differences in Stimulation Induced Paresthesia Between 2 Spinal Cord Stimulation Systems
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Interventions
- Device: Treatment with the Axium SCS systemDevice: Treatment with the Medtronic SCS System
- Registration Number
- NCT02250469
- Lead Sponsor
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Brief Summary
12-SMI-2014 is a post-market, randomised, pilot study to identify and rate differences in patient experiences with two different types of Spinal Cord Stimulator devices which are routinely used to treat chronic pain.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 5
- Subject is appropriate for SCS implantation according to standard criteria
- Subject is >18 to <75 years old
- Subject is able and willing to comply with the follow-up schedule and protocol
- Subject has chronic (> 6 months) uni/bi-lateral neuropathic pain in the lower limb(s) (below the knee) with predominant foot pain
- Minimum baseline pain rating of 50 mm on the VAS in the primary region of pain
- Subject is able to provide written informed consent
- Subject has no other exclusion criteria for SCS implantation according to standard criteria
- Subject has had corticosteroid therapy at an intended site of stimulation within the past 30 days
- Subject has had radiofrequency treatment of an intended target DRG within the past 3 months
- Subject has participated in another clinical study within 30 days
- Subject has been previously treated with and failed to respond to an implantable neuromodulation therapy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Axium SCS System Treatment with the Axium SCS system Implantation with the Axium Neurostimulator Medtronic SCS System Treatment with the Medtronic SCS System Implantation with the Medtronic Prime Advanced Dorsal Column Stimulation System
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Stability of Stimulation Induced Paresthesia 3 Months post implantation A comparative analysis will be made between groups to determine any changes in the intensity of stimulation induced paresthesia in response to changes in body position
Patient Interactions with System 3 Months post implantation A comparative analysis will be made between groups to determine the number of device interactions patients need to have on average, daily
Specificity of Stimulation Induced Paresthesia 3 Months post implantation A comparative analysis will be made between groups to determine the percentage of a patients painful and non-painful anatomy that is covered by stimulation induced paresthesia
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Academisch Medisch Centrum
🇳🇱Amsterdam, Netherlands