Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/NCT06405672
NCT06405672
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable

Comparison of Using an Endotracheal Tube With Stylet Versus an Endotracheal Tube Alone in Morbidly Obese Patients

Antalya Training and Research Hospital0 sites80 target enrollmentApril 30, 2024
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsIntubation; Difficult or FailedObesity, Morbid

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Intubation; Difficult or Failed
Sponsor
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Enrollment
80
Primary Endpoint
Intubation time
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
last year
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

The investigators aimed to compare the effects of using enotracheal tube with stylet versus endotracheal tube alone in morbidly obese patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy.

Detailed Description

Different intubation techniques have been used in morbidly obese patients undergoing general anesthesia. No study comparing the use of endotracheal tube with or without stylet was found in literature. Thus, the investigators aimed to compare the effects of using enotracheal tube with stylet versus endotracheal tube alone in morbidly obese patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 30, 2024
End Date
September 30, 2024
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Body mass index over 30 ASA physical status I-III Undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy -

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Body mass index under 30 ASA physical status IV Unable to cooperate Refused to give writtten informed consent-

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Intubation time

Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

from handling laryngoscope to first vision of end-tidal CO2 waveform

Secondary Outcomes

  • complications(through study completion, an average of 6 months)
  • Intubation success(through study completion, an average of 6 months)

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
The Comparison of two methods of endotracheal tube cuff pressure regulation on atelectasis in patients under mechanical ventilatio
IRCT2017091319677N4Vice Chancellor for Research Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences220
Completed
Not Applicable
Endotrol-tracheal Tube Assisted Endotracheal Intubation During Video LaryngoscopyEndotracheal Intubation
NCT01099969The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston60
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Nasal Intubation：a Comparison of Different Endotracheal TubesIntubation Complication
NCT05112783Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital80
Completed
Phase 4
Stylet Use for McGrath VideolaryngoscopeOrotracheal Intubation
NCT02642367Ajou University School of Medicine140
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison Between Two Endotracheal Tube Cuff Inflation MethodsEndotracheal Cuff PressureFlow-Volume Loop GuidedStethoscope-guided
NCT03902756Ramathibodi Hospital80