MedPath

Anesthetic Efficacy of Gow-Gates Versus Conventional Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Techniques

Not Applicable
Conditions
Anesthesia; Reaction
Pain
Interventions
Procedure: Type of block injection
Registration Number
NCT01329874
Lead Sponsor
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Gow Gates block injection is more effective than conventional alveolar nerve block in anesthetising mandibular molars with acute pulpitis.

Detailed Description

Pain management and adequate anesthesia are of critical importance for the endodontist. Traditionally, mandibular teeth are anesthetized via inferior alveolar nerve block (IAN). However, this technique provides a marginal success rate of 19-56% in patients with irreversible pulpitis.Gow Gates technique introduced in 1973 for anesthetizing of mandibular molars with more accuracy, success and safety.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria
  • Mandibular molars with acute irreversible pulpitis
Exclusion Criteria
  • Unhealthy patients
  • Patients who had taken pain killer less than 4 hours before appointment

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Gow gates ,conventional block injectionType of block injectionPatients will be selected from a group with acute irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars. Half of the patients randomly selected for receiving gow gates block injection and half will receive traditional inferior block injection by 3.6 ml Lidocaine plus epinephrine.Teeth with no response to anesthetizing will be randomly divided into two group of either buccal or lingual infiltration.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of participant who will have pain following Gow gates or traditional inferior alveolar nerve block6 months

All participant asked to show their pain degree on VAS for evaluation the efficacy of two different block injections and two different infiltrations ( Buccal and lingual) as supplementary injections.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Heart rate monitoringbefore and after block injections (day 1)

These records will be monitored by pulse oximeter device

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Dept of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry

🇮🇷

Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi, Iran, Islamic Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath