A Three-arm, Parallel Group, Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Impact of GeneSight Psychotropic and Enhanced-GeneSight Psychotropic, on Response to Psychotropic Treatment in Outpatients Suffering From a Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Having Had - Within the Current Episode - an Inadequate Response to at Least One Psychotropic Medication Included in GeneSight Psychotropic
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Depressive Disorder, Major
- Sponsor
- Assurex Health Inc.
- Enrollment
- 542
- Locations
- 14
- Primary Endpoint
- Change in depressive symptoms as assessed by the 17-item Hamilton Depression (HAM-D17) score
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Evidence exists supporting the ability of genetic variations to influence patient drug response and side effects. Previous studies utilizing an open-label design have shown significant improvement in major depressive disorder (MDD) patient outcomes following use of the GeneSight Psychotropic (GEN) test. The first objective of this trial is to utilize a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial design to replicate previous findings of improvement in clinical outcomes in MDD subjects whose medication therapy was guided by GEN testing. Another objective is to determine the added benefit of Enhanced-GeneSight (E-GEN) compared to GEN for the pharmacogenomic guidance of treatment selections. Furthermore, this trial intends to develop an evidence-based case for the value of GEN and E-GEN to Canadian healthcare payers.
Detailed Description
The primary objectives of this study are 1) to compare the efficacy of GEN to treatment as usual (TAU) in improving response to psychotropic treatment in outpatients suffering from a MDD and having had - within the current episode - an inadequate response to at least one psychotropic medication included in GEN; and 2) to validate the utility of the new CAMH markers and demonstrate the superior predictive capabilities and greater clinical utility of E-GEN as compared to GEN. This study is designed as a three-arm multi-centre, double-blind (participants and raters), randomized controlled trial to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of GEN, E-GEN and TAU for patients suffering from a MDD and having had - within the current episode - an inadequate response to at least one psychotropic medication included in GEN. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to each of the three treatment arms. Recruitment will be 24 months. Follow-up will be 12 months. Subjects will complete short diagnostic interviews specific to their clinical diagnosis, basic metabolic measures (eg. blood pressure, weight), and provide buccal swab samples for genetic analysis (the unanalyzed buccal swabs and associated DNA will be biobanked). During the first visit, blood and urine samples will be required for laboratory panel screening and blood biobanking. Subjects will be monitored over a one year period and clinical measures and healthcare resource utilization will be obtained. Treating clinicians in the GEN and E-GEN arms will receive an easy to implement report providing pharmacogenomic guidance for prescribing psychotropic medications to their patients. The study will recruit subjects from 10 sites, stratified into 2 clusters. Nine study sites altogether will form one of the two stratified clusters. CAMH will constitute the tenth study site and the second stratified cluster.The sample size required for this study was calculated using effect size estimates drawn from a previous study conducted by Hall-Flavin et al \[Pharmacogenetics Genomics 2013; 23(10)\]. Assuming an effect size of 0.30 in HAM-D17 score favoring the treatment group, intra class coefficient between clusters of 20%, statistical power of 90%, an alpha level of 0.05, and an expected 16.7% rate of premature discontinuation by Week 8 (primary endpoint), a total of 570 subjects (i.e., 190 per treatment arm) are required to detect the same effect in this study.
Investigators
Ana Gugila
Sponsor
Assurex Health Inc.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •18 years of age or older;
- •Suffer from a Major Depressive Episode meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria;
- •Have had an inadequate response within the current episode to at least one psychotropic treatment in GEN. Inadequate response is defined as inadequate efficacy after 6 weeks of a psychotropic treatment or discontinuation of a psychotropic treatment due to adverse events (AEs) or intolerability;
- •Have each a score on the 16-item Clinician Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-C16) and 16-item Self-Report Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16) rating scales ≥ 11;
- •Be able to understand the requirements of the study and provide written informed consent to participate in this study;
- •Agree to abide by the study protocol and its restrictions and be able to complete all aspects of the study, including all visits and tests.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients posing a serious suicidal risk and/or in need of immediate hospitalization as judged by the Investigator;
- •Patients with a diagnosis of Bipolar I or II disorder;
- •Patients with a current Axis I diagnosis of:
- •Amnestic and/or other cognitive disorder
- •Schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder;
- •Patients having experienced hallucinations, delusions, or any psychotic symptomatology within the current depressive episode or during prior depressive episodes;
- •Patient is currently in an inpatient facility;
- •Patients with a history of hypothyroidism unless taking a stable dose of thyroid medication and asymptomatic or euthyroid for at least 6 months;
- •Patients who meet DSM-IV-TR criteria for any significant current substance use disorder;
- •Patients with:
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change in depressive symptoms as assessed by the 17-item Hamilton Depression (HAM-D17) score
Time Frame: From baseline to Week 8
Mean change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression (HAM-D17) score from baseline to Week 8 of the study
Secondary Outcomes
- Change in severity of illness as assessed by the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)(Baseline, Week 12 and Month 12)
- Change in anxiety symptoms as assessed by theGeneralized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item (GAD-7) Scale(Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12, and Month 12)
- Weight gain(Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12, and Month 12)
- Waist-to-hip ratio(Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12, and Month 12)
- Change in health related quality of life as assessed by the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36)(Baseline, Week 12, Months 6, 9 and 12)
- Change in depressive symptoms as assessed by the 16-Item Clinician Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16)(Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12, and Month 12)
- Change in global improvement as assessed by the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I)(Week 12, and Month 12)
- Change in global therapeutic benefit and global severity of side effects as assessed by the Clinical Global Impression Efficacy Index(Week 12 and Month 12)
- Changes to initial prescribing based on availability of pharmacogenomic data(Screening and Baseline)
- Response rates to psychotropic medication(Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12, Months 6, 9 and 12)
- Time to response(Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12, Months 6, 9 and 12)
- Change in global measure of side effects (frequency, intensity, and burden domains) as assessed by the Frequency, Intensity, and Burden of Side Effects Ratings (FIBSER)(Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12, and Month 12)
- Change in psychotropic medication side effects as assessed by the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogeler (UKU) Side Effect Rating Scale(Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12, and Month 12)
- Change in depressive symptoms as assessed by the 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)(Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12, and Month 12)
- Remission rates(Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12, Months 6, 9 and 12)
- Time to remission(Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12, Months 6, 9 and 12)
- Change in health related quality of life as assessed by the EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L)(Baseline, Week 12, Months 6, 9 and 12)
- Pharmacogenetics in Psychiatry Follow-up Questionnaire (PIPFQ)(Baseline, when prescription changes are made (expected average of every 4 weeks), and Month 12)
- Healthcare resource utilization (Composite measure of healthcare costs): physician visits, hospital utilization, emergency department visits, medication use, and laboratory tests(Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12, Months 6, 9 and 12)
- Productivity losses (measured as economic costs)(Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12, Months 6, 9 and 12)