跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05349357
NCT05349357已完成不适用

Compare the Effects of Sliding With Tensioner Technique of Neural Mobilization in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Patients

Riphah International University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 32 人开始时间: 2022年6月25日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
32
试验地点
1
主要终点
Michigan neuropathy screening instrument

研究概览

简要总结

Neurodynamics, i.e., the mobilization of the peripheral nervous system, is a physical approach to the treatment of pain; the method relies on influencing pain physiology via mechanical treatment of neural tissues and the non-neural structures surrounding the nervous system. Neural mobilization (NM) is used to treat various disorders of the nervous system concerning the length and mobility of peripheral nerves, as the nerve mobilizing refers to techniques that help to reestablish motion between a nerve and its surrounding soft tissues, thus to treat the nerves that have become entangled within the soft tissue, as it leads to tension release on a nerve by stretching and pulling one end of the nerve during keeping the other end in a relaxed state.

详细描述

The neurodynamic technique both sliders and tensioners results in changes of the mechanical or physiological function of nerve tissues along with the interface; restoring pressure gradients, relieving hypoxia and pain resulting in reducing associated symptoms.

Through clinical reasoning the nervous system seems to be the logical place for treatment and explanations and previous descriptions of this method have clarified the overall impact on quality of life in diabetic peripheral neuropathy but it doesn't discuss which technique of neural mobilization is more effective and its effects on diabetic peripheral neuropathic population. Within this reasoning it is important to determine which neurodynamic technique is more effective in improving quality of life and reduce pain in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
50 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patient having≥12score on Self report Leads Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Sign
  • Patients with lower limb pain ≥4 to ≤7 on NPRS

排除标准

  • Diabetic foot ulcer
  • Complex regional pain syndrome
  • Infection in lower limb
  • Lower extremity amputation
  • Discogenic pain
  • Restricted joint deformity
  • Dependency on chemical or drugs
  • Pregnancy

结局指标

主要结局

Michigan neuropathy screening instrument

时间窗: 3 weeks

For screening the neuropathy; The MNSI questionnaire is self-administered. Responses are added to obtain a total score. 'Yes' responses to questions 1-3, 5-6, 8-9, 11-12, 14-15 are each counted as one point. 'No' responses to questions 7 and 13 each count as one point. Question 4 was considered to be a measure of impaired circulation and question 10 a measure of general asthenia and were not included in the published scoring algorithm. A score of ≥ 7 was considered abnormal. All 15 questions were included in the new scoring algorithms.

Numerical Pain Rating Scale

时间窗: 3 weeks

Quantify the pain ranging from 0 to 10 in which zero means no pain and 10 severe pain

次要结局

  • Quality of Life SF-36(3 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Slider Versus Tensioner Neural Mobilization in... | 临床试验