A Study Of PF-04171327 In The Treatment Of The Signs And Symptoms Of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Phase 2

Completed

Conditions: Rheumatoid Arthritis

Interventions: Drug: PF-04171327 10 mg
Drug: PF-04171327 25 mg
Other: Placebo
Drug: Prednisone 5 mg
Other: Prednisone Placebo
Other: Placebo for PF-04171327

Registration Number: NCT00938587

Lead Sponsor: Pfizer

Brief Summary: This study will investigate the safety and efficacy of an investigational drug, PF-04171327 on the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis in patients that require glucocorticoids while on background methotrexate. This study will also look at the response of chemical and biological markers in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Lastly, this study will measure the PK (amount of drug in the blood) of methotrexate while patients may be taking PF-04171327.

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 86

Inclusion Criteria

Patients ≥ 18 years of age, diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis for a minimum duration of 3 months
On stable dose of methotrexate for at least 6 weeks prior to screening
Patient must have minimum disease activity level of ≥ 6 tender/painful joints, ≥ 6 swollen joints and CRP ≥ 0.7 mg/dL
Not currently receiving steroid medication

Exclusion Criteria

Pregnant or nursing women
Patients that have active infections, TB, HIV and/or Hepatitis B or C
Patients that have a history of intolerance or significant adverse effects with the use of glucocorticoids

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
PF-04171327 10 mg	PF-04171327 10 mg	-
PF-04171327 10 mg	Prednisone Placebo	-
PF-04171327 25 mg	PF-04171327 25 mg	-
PF-04171327 25 mg	Prednisone Placebo	-
Prednisone	Placebo for PF-04171327	-
Placebo	Placebo	-
Placebo	Placebo for PF-04171327	-
Prednisone	Prednisone 5 mg	-

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP]) at Day 14	Baseline, Day 14	DAS28-4 (CRP) examines progression or improvement of RA. It was assessed from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) using the 28 joints count, CRP (normal range of CRP is less than (\<) 10 milligram per liter \[mg/L\], decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation) and participant global assessment (PGA) of disease activity (participant global assessment of diseases condition scores ranging from 0 \[very well condition\] to 100 \[very poor condition\], higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) transformed score range: 0 (least severe) to 10 (most severe), higher scores indicate more severe disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) scores: less than equal to (\<=) 3.2 implied low disease activity; greater than (\>) 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count at Day 7, 14, 42	Baseline, Day 7, 14, 42	Number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1.
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count at Day 7, 14 and 42	Baseline, Day 7, 14, 42	Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying if swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1.
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Day 7, 14 and 42	Baseline, Day 7, 14, 42	The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. Normal range of CRP is less than (\<) 10 mg/L. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Day 7 and 14	Baseline, Day 7, 14	HAQ-DI assessed the ability of participants to perform task in 8 domains of daily living activities: dress/groom, arise, eat, walk, reach, grip, hygiene, and common activities. Each item was scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3: 0= no difficulty; 1= some difficulty; 2= much difficulty; 3= unable to do, higher scores indicate more difficulty. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible HAQ-DI score range: 0 (no difficulty) to 3 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate more difficulty while performing daily living activities.
Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Day 7 and 14	Baseline, Day 7, 14	Participant assessment of arthritis pain included assessment of severity of arthritis pain using a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS). Participants placed a mark on the VAS between 0 mm (no pain) and 100 mm (most severe pain), which corresponded to the magnitude of their pain, higher scores indicate more pain.
Change From Baseline in Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis at Day 7 and 14	Baseline, Day 7, 14	PGA was a questionnaire where participants answered the following question, "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" The participants' response were recorded using a 100 mm visual analog scale placing a mark on the scale, between 0 mm (very well condition) to 100 mm (very poor condition). Higher scores indicate higher degree of arthritis.
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) of Arthritis at Day 7 and 14	Baseline, Day 7, 14	PhGA included assessment of severity of arthritis pain where physicians were asked to rate the severity of the participant's overall arthritis. The physician's response was recorded using a visual analog scale between 0 mm (very good condition) to 100 mm (very poor condition). Higher scores indicate higher degree of arthritis.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Version 2.0 (V2) at Day 14	Baseline, Day 14 (D14)	SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. Score for each of the 8 aspects are scaled from 0 (worst condition) to 100 (best condition), where higher scores indicate better health status. These 8 domains were also reported as two summary scores: physical component scores and mental component scores. Score range for each of the 2 summary scores = 0 (worst condition) to 100 (best condition), where higher scores represent better health status.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Day 7, 14 and 42	Baseline, Day 7, 14, 42	DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the swollen joint count and tender joint count using the 28 joints count and CRP (normal range of CRP is \<10 mg/L, decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation). Total DAS28-3 (CRP) score range: 0 (least severe) to 9.4 (most severe), higher scores indicate more disease activity.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP]) at Day 7	Baseline, Day 7	DAS28-4 (CRP) examines progression or improvement of RA. It was assessed from SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, CRP (normal range of CRP is \<10 mg/L, decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation) and PGA of disease activity (participant global assessment of diseases condition scores ranging from 0 \[very well condition\] to 100 \[very poor condition\], higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total DAS28-4 (CRP) transformed score range: 0 (least severe) to 10 (most severe), higher scores indicate more severe disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) scores: \<=3.2 implied low disease activity; \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Day 7 and 14	Day 7, 14	ACR70 responder: participants who achieved at =70% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joints count, and \>=70% improvement in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of arthritis pain (participant's self-assessed severity of arthritis pain, score range from 0\[no pain\] to 100\[most severe pain\], higher scores=more pain), 2) PGA of arthritis (participant's assessed overall arthritis activity, score range from 0\[no arthritis\] to 100\[extreme arthritis\], higher scores=higher degree of arthritis), 3) PhGA of arthritis (physician rated severity of participants overall arthritis activity, score range from 0\[no arthritis\] to 100\[extreme arthritis\], higher scores=higher degree of arthritis), 4) HAQ-DI (assessment of functional disability, score range from 0\[no difficulty\] to 3\[extreme difficulty\], higher scores=more functional limitation) and 5) CRP (assessment of inflammation, normal range of CRP is \<10 mg/L, decrease in the level of CRP=reduction in inflammation).
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Day 7 and 14	Day 7, 14	ACR20 responder: participants who achieved at =20% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joints count, and \>=20% improvement in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of arthritis pain (participant's self-assessed severity of arthritis pain, score range from 0\[no pain\] to 100\[most severe pain\], higher scores=more pain), 2) PGA of arthritis (participant's assessed overall arthritis activity, score range from 0\[no arthritis\] to 100\[extreme arthritis\], higher scores=higher degree of arthritis), 3) PhGA of arthritis (physician rated severity of participants overall arthritis activity, score range from 0\[no arthritis\] to 100\[extreme arthritis\], higher scores=higher degree of arthritis), 4) HAQ-DI (assessment of functional disability, score range from 0\[no difficulty\] to 3\[extreme difficulty\], higher scores=more functional limitation) and 5) CRP (assessment of inflammation, normal range of CRP is \<10 mg/L, decrease in the level of CRP=reduction in inflammation).
Change From Baseline in Osteocalcin Level at Day 1, 7 and 14	Baseline; 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose on Day 1; 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose on Day 7 and 14
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Day 7 and 14	Day 7, 14	ACR50 responder: participants who achieved at =50% improvement in tender and swollen 28-joints count, and \>=50% improvement in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: 1) participant's assessment of arthritis pain (participant's self-assessed severity of arthritis pain, score range from 0\[no pain\] to 100\[most severe pain\], higher scores=more pain), 2) PGA of arthritis (participant's assessed overall arthritis activity, score range from 0\[no arthritis\] to 100\[extreme arthritis\], higher scores=higher degree of arthritis), 3) PhGA of arthritis (physician rated severity of participants overall arthritis activity, score range from 0\[no arthritis\] to 100\[extreme arthritis\], higher scores=higher degree of arthritis), 4) HAQ-DI (assessment of functional disability, score range from 0\[no difficulty\] to 3\[extreme difficulty\], higher scores=more functional limitation) and 5) CRP (assessment of inflammation, normal range of CRP is \<10 mg/L, decrease in the level of CRP=reduction in inflammation).
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)	Baseline up to Day 45	An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 31 days after last dose (Day 45) that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Laboratory Abnormalities	Baseline up to Day 45	Criteria for laboratory abnormalities: Hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit \<0.8\baseline; platelet count \<75 or \>700\10\^3 per mm\^3; leucocytes \<2.5 or \>17.5\10\^3 per mm\^3); chemistry (total bilirubin \>1.5\upper limit of reference range \[ULN\]; aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, \>3.0\ULN; total protein, albumin \<0.8\lower limit of reference range \[LLN\] or \>1.2\ULN; blood urea nitrogen \[BUN\]/urea, creatinine \>1.3\ULN; glucose \[fasting\] \<0.6\LLN or \>1.5\ULN; uric acid \>1.2\ULN; sodium \<0.95\LLN or \>1.05\ULN; potassium, calcium \<0.9\LLN or \>1.1\ULN; albumin, total protein \<0.8\LLN or \>1.2\*ULN; urinalysis (urine white blood cell (WBC) =\>6/ high power field (hpf); urine red blood cell (RBC) =\>6/hpf). Number of participants with clinically significant change from baseline in laboratory abnormalities identified by investigator were reported.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Day 7 and 14	Baseline, Day 7, 14
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities	Baseline up to Day 45	Following parameters were analyzed for examination of vital signs: systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and body temperature. Vital sign measurements were performed with the participant in the seated position. Clinical significance vital sign abnormality was determined by investigator.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities	Baseline up to Day 45	Clinically significant ECG findings included PR interval \>=300 milliseconds (msec) or \>=25% increase from baseline (if baseline PR interval \>200 msec) or \>=50% increase (if baseline PR interval less than or equal to \[\<=\] 200 msec); QRS interval \>=200 msec or \>=25% increase from baseline (if baseline PR interval \>100 msec) or \>=50% increase (if baseline PR interval \<= 100 msec); QT interval \>=500 msec, corrected QT interval \>=500 msec.
Plasma Concentration of PF-00251802 Versus Time Summary on Day 7 and Day 14	0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose on Day 7, 14	Plasma concentration of PF-00251802 versus time summary, a metabolite of PF-04171327 was reported in this outcome measure.
Ratio of Apparent Oral Clearance on Day 1 to Day 14 of Methotrexate	Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose	Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood. Methotrexate was used as a background therapy by participants.
Change From Baseline in Lymphocyte Counts at Day 1, 7 and 14	Baseline; 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose on Day 1; 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose on Day 7 and 14
Change From Baseline in Neutrophil Counts at Day 1, 7 and 14	Baseline; 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose on Day 1; 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose on Day 7 and 14
Change From Baseline in Eosinophil Counts at Day 1, 7 and 14	Baseline; 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose on Day 1; 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose on Day 7 and 14
Change From Baseline in Plasma Cortisol Level at Day 1, 7 and 14	Baseline; 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose on Day 1; 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post-dose on Day 7 and 14
Change From Baseline in Ratio of Urinary N-terminal Telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen (uNTX-I) Level to Urinary Creatinine (uCr) Level at Day 7 and 14	Baseline, Day 7 and 14	Unit of ratio of urinary N-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (uNTX-I) level to urinary creatinine (uCr) level was nanomoles bone collagen equivalents (nmol bce) per millimole creatinine (mmol cr).
Change From Baseline in Adiponectin Level at Day 7 and 14	Baseline, Day 7 and 14

Trial Locations

Locations (41): MAV Korhaz es Rendelointezet
🇭🇺
Szolnok, Hungary
Revmatologicka ambulance
🇨🇿
Praha 4, Czechia
Anniston Medical Clinic, PC
🇺🇸
Anniston, Alabama, United States
Institute for Rheumatic and Cardiovascular Disease Niska Banja
🇷🇸
Niska Banja, Serbia
Synexus Magyarorszag Kft.
🇭🇺
Budapest, Hungary
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Rheumatology, Internal Medicine
🇰🇷
Seoul, Korea, Republic of
ARTMEDI UPD s r.o.
🇨🇿
Hostivice, Czechia
MEDIPONT Plus, s.r.o.
🇨🇿
Ceske Budejovice, Czechia
DC Mediscan
🇨🇿
Praha 11 - Chodov, Czechia
Institution of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences Research Institute of Rheumatology RAMS
🇷🇺
Moscow, Russian Federation
Dr. Rethy Pal Korhaz es Rendelointezet\Reumatologia
🇭🇺
Bekescsaba, Hungary
Fakultni Thomayerova nemocnice s poliklinikou
🇨🇿
Praha 4, Czechia
Allergy, Asthma, Arthritis and Lung
🇺🇸
Daytona Beach, Florida, United States
Elite Research Institute
🇺🇸
Miami, Florida, United States
Pinnacle Research Group, LLC
🇺🇸
Anniston, Alabama, United States
Florida Medical Clinic, PA
🇺🇸
Zephyrhills, Florida, United States
The Arthritis Center
🇺🇸
Springfield, Illinois, United States
Premier Imaging Center
🇺🇸
Bingham Farms, Michigan, United States
Institute of Rheumatology
🇷🇸
Belgrade, Serbia
Moscow SHI City Clinical Hospital #4, Department of Therapy of Moscow Faculty
🇷🇺
Moscow, Russian Federation
SI Saint-Petersburg SRI for Emergency Care named after I.I. Dzhanelidze
🇷🇺
Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
Regional State Institution of Healthcare Smolensk Regional Clinical Hospital
🇷🇺
Smolensk, Russian Federation
Nestatna reumatologicka ambulancia, MUDr. Pavol Polak, s.r.o.
🇸🇰
Zilina, Slovakia
Hospital de Cruces
🇪🇸
Baracaldo, Bilbao, Spain
Hospital de Basurto
🇪🇸
Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
🇪🇸
Sevilla, Spain
Ankara University School fo Medicine
🇹🇷
Ankara, Turkey
Chair of Cardiology & Functional Diagnostic
🇺🇦
Kharkiv, Ukraine
Municipal City Clinical Hospital #4, Department of Rheumatology
🇺🇦
Lviv, Ukraine
Altoona Center for Clinical Research
🇺🇸
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
Millennium Research
🇺🇸
Ormond Beach, Florida, United States
Quest Research Institute
🇺🇸
Bingham Farms, Michigan, United States
Debreceni Egyetem Orvos és Egeszsegtudomanyi Centrum
🇭🇺
Debrecen, Hungary
State Institution 'Institute of Gerontology of AMS of Ukraine'
🇺🇦
Kyiv, Ukraine
Hospital Nuestra Señora de La Esperanza
🇪🇸
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
Vinnitsa Regional Clinical Hospital n.a. Pirogov
🇺🇦
Vinnitsa, Ukraine
Changi General Hospital
🇸🇬
Singapore, Singapore
Narodny ustav reumatickych chorob, Klinicke oddelenie
🇸🇰
Piestany, Slovakia
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
🇨🇳
Taichung, Taiwan
State Institution "Institute of Gerontology of AMS of Ukraine"
🇺🇦
Kyiv, Ukraine
Centre for Assessment and Treatment of Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Medicine and Geriatrics
🇭🇰
New Territories, Hong Kong