Feasibility and Acceptability of Music Therapy for Chronic Pain
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Registration Number
- NCT05426941
- Lead Sponsor
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine
- Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of two music interventions delivered through telehealth for chronic musculoskeletal pain. This pilot study evaluates outcomes (feasibility, acceptability, pain and associated outcomes) in a single-component, minimally interactive music listening (ML) intervention and a multi-component, more interactive music imagery (MI) intervention.
- Detailed Description
FAMILIA is a 3-arm, parallel group, pilot trial. Sixty Veterans will be randomized to one of three conditions: MI, ML, or usual care. Aim 1 is to test the feasibility and acceptability of a multi-component, interactive MI intervention (8-weekly, individual sessions) and a single-component, minimally interactive ML intervention (independent music listening). Feasibility metrics related to recruitment, retention, engagement, and completion of treatment protocol and questionnaires will be assessed. Up to 20 qualitative interviews will be conducted to assess Veteran experiences with both interventions, including perceived benefits, acceptability, barriers, and facilitators. Interview transcripts will be coded and analyzed for emergent themes. Aim 2 is to explore the effects of MI and ML versus usual care on pain and associated patient-centered outcomes. These outcomes and potential mediators will be explored through changes from baseline to follow-up assessments at 1, 3, and 4 months. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe outcomes; this pilot study is not powered to detect differences in outcomes.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Chronic (> 6 months) musculoskeletal pain of at least moderate severity (≥5 on 0-10 numeric scale)
- Access to a personal computer, tablet computer, and/or smartphone,
- Ability to pass technology assessment screen, and
- Not currently receiving music therapy services
- Serious or unstable medical (e.g., Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) or psychiatric illness (e.g., psychosis, mania) or housing insecurity that could compromise study participation,
- Suicidal ideation with current intent/plan,
- Hearing or cognitive impairment that may interfere with music listening or abstract thinking needed for imagery work,
- Lack access to a personal computer, tablet computer, and/or smartphone,
- Unable to pass technology assessment screen, or
- Currently receiving music therapy services.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of contacted and eligible Veterans consent to study participation, attend intervention sessions, and complete the treatment protocol and scheduled outcome assessments? at 3 months Determine the feasibility of the music therapy interventions
Aspects of the interventions do Veterans perceive to be most/least helpful or most/least liked? at 3 months Assess participant acceptability of the music therapy interventions
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Numeric Rating Scale for Pain intensity Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months assessment of severity of pain, scored 0 to 10 with higher scores representing more intense pain
Patient Global Impression of Change Scale 1,3 and 4 months assessment of treatment response, scored 1 to 7 with higher scores representing greater improvement from starting the intervention
PROMIS Sleep Scale Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months assessment of sleep quality, scored 1 to 5 with higher scores representing worse sleep quality (worse outcome)
EQ 5D Scale for Health-Related Quality of Life Baseline and 3 months assessment of generic health-related quality of life, scored 0 to 100 with higher scores represent improved quality of life (better outcome)
PHQ-9 Depression Measure Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months assessment of depression severity, scored 0 to 27 with higher scores representing more severe depression (worse outcome)
GAD-7 Anxiety Measure Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months assessment of anxiety severity, scored 0 to 21 with higher scores representing more severe anxiety (worse outcome)
Perceived Stress Scale Baseline and 3 months assessment of stress severity, scored 0 to 14 with higher scores representing more severe stress (worse outcome)
Brief Pain Inventory - Pain interference subscale Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months how does pain interfere with 7 activities, scored 0 to 10 with higher scores representing more interference of pain with activities
Brief Pain Catastrophizing Scale Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months assessment of pain belief, scored 0 to 12 with higher scores representing more pain catastrophizing (worse outcome)
Centrality of Pain Scale Baseline, 1, 3, and 4 months assessment of pain coping, scored 10 to 50 with higher scores representing the belief that pain is central to individual's life (worse outcome)
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Roudebush VA Medical Center
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Roudebush VA Medical Center🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United StatesBarry BarkerContact317-988-4312Barry.Barker@va.govMatthew BairContact317-988-2058Matthew.Bair@va.gov