Growing Strong Study of Unconditional Cash Transfers Plus Voluntary Peer Support to Reduce Shelter Stays and Improve Family Well-being for Families With Babies in New York City Homeless Shelters
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中(未招募)
- 入组人数
- 200
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Time to shelter exit
研究概览
简要总结
The Growing Strong program tests a novel approach to helping families with young children living in homeless shelters, namely offering guaranteed, unconditional cash gifts that families can use as they wish plus voluntary peer support. The assumption behind this approach is that families know best how to allocate resources to meet their own individual needs. While there are a number of Direct Cash Transfer studies taking place around the country, the investigator(s) are unaware of any that have tested the relationship of receiving cash on homelessness among families specifically. To be eligible to participate in the study, families must reside in a homeless shelter and have at least one child under two years of age living with them in shelter. The investigator(s) have tied eligibility to the age of the youngest child in the household because rates of shelter use are highest among this population and because the costs associated with young children increase such families' financial burdens.
A total of 200 families will be enrolled in the study. One hundred families in the active intervention group will receive $1,500 per month ("substantial cash") for 24 months ($18,000 annually) and may also elect to receive peer support services. One hundred families in the active comparison group will receive $50 per month ("nominal cash") for 24 months ($600 annually) and will not have access to the peer support services. A third, passive comparison group will receive usual care within the homeless shelter system in the same metropolitan area (New York City) as participants in both cash gift groups. This group of families will be followed only in administrative records.
The main research questions are: does providing substantial, unconditional cash transfers plus access to voluntary peer support services over 24 months a) reduce the length of time in shelter for families with young children and/or b) improve other aspects of family and child well-being relative to providing nominal cash transfers alone or usual care.
详细描述
In the Growing Strong study, 200 families residing in the Women in Need (Win) homeless shelter system who have at least one child under two years of age living with them in shelter and who have been found "eligible" for shelter by New York City will participate. Families will be assigned to one of two cash gift conditions. One hundred families will be assigned to the active intervention group and will receive $1,500 per month via debit card for 24 months ($18,000 annually) to use as they wish along with access to free, voluntary peer support services. One hundred families will be assigned to the active comparison group and receive $50 per month via debit card for 24 months ($600 annually) to use as they wish but will not have access to the peer support services. A passive comparison group will be constructed from the administrative data of propensity-matched families within in the New York City homeless shelter system who would have met the criteria to participate in the study had they resided in one of the Win target shelters. This study is funded by a grant to Win from a private foundation, thus all target shelters are operated by Win.
Design
The Growing Strong study design is quasi-experimental with intentional assignment at the shelter level rather than experimental with random assignment at the family or shelter level for several reasons. Participants were not randomized at the family level in order to eliminate the possibility that comparably situated families living in the same shelter could enroll in the study and yet receive very different cash amounts. Participants were not randomized at the shelter level because there were too few shelters in the final design for randomization to balance the characteristics of families across conditions in expectation. The overall sample size for families was limited by the substantial cost of the intervention (between $600 - $18,000 plus costs of peer support annually per family).
Families can be assigned to treatment conditions based on their shelter placements because New York City makes placement decisions in a quasi-random fashion based on the availability and size of shelter rooms/apartments. Initially the investigator(s) selected three shelters within the Win shelter system that are as closely matched as possible on room sizes and other characteristics that affect placements. When recruitment went more slowly than anticipated, additional shelters in the Win system were included. Assignment to treatment groups is dependent solely on the shelter where the family is assigned by the New York City Department of Social Services, which depends on availability and room size. We have sought to balance shelters assigned to treatment and comparison groups by the sizes of rooms. The underlying, quasi-random City placement process should equate the two groups in expectation. The investigator(s) will check whether families in the two groups are in fact well-matched and control for any differences between them during analysis if needed.
Procedures
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
Participants will be blind to condition at the baseline assessment but will be unmasked immediately afterwards (they will receive debit cards and learn whether they are eligible for peer support). At baseline, interviewers will likely be aware of study conditions because they will interview respondents at shelters and shelter is associated with condition. At subsequent assessments interviewers will remain blind to study condition to the extent possible, but may well learn the condition from respondents, especially those who complete qualitative interviews. Win staff who provide usual care to both groups will be blind to the study condition. Participants in the passive comparison group will be unaware of the study.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Note that New York City has a right to shelter. When a family applies for shelter, the City assigns them to a shelter temporarily while City workers determine whether the family is truly homeless. If so, the City will deem the family "eligible" for shelter. If not, the family must leave.
- •Inclusion Criteria:
- •A family has been found "eligible" for shelter (as described above) within the past 30 days
- •The family has a baby who meets the age criteria (under 2 years of age)
- •There is an adult 18 or over who has custody of the child (typically the mother)
- •The family speaks English or Spanish
- •The family lives in a designated Win shelter
排除标准
- •None: any family configuration is permissible
研究组 & 干预措施
Large unconditional cash transfers plus voluntary peer support
These participants will receive monthly cash transfers of $1,500 via debit card for 24 months and can elect to participate in peer support services plus usual care from shelter staff.
干预措施: Large unconditional cash transfers plus voluntary peer support. (Behavioral)
Nominal cash transfers
These participants will receive monthly cash transfers of $50 via debit card for 24 months plus usual care from shelter staff.
干预措施: Nominal cash transfers (Behavioral)
Passive comparison
These propensity-matched families will reside in other New York City shelters and will be followed anonymously in administrative records only. The will receive usual care from shelter staff.
干预措施: Passive comparison group (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Time to shelter exit
时间窗: 18 months
Measured using administrative data for active study groups and passive comparison group. Data provided by New York City Department of Social Services/Department of Homeless Services (DSS/DHS). Total time between family's being found eligible for shelter and shelter exit.
次要结局
- Target Child Development: Child Behavior Problems*(30 months)
- Employment: Adult Work for Pay(Baseline to 30 months)
- Target Child Development: Child Verbal Development(Baseline to 30 months)
- Parenting: Chaos in the Home*(Baseline to 30 months)
- Adult Well-Being: Adult Psychological Distress*(Baseline to 30 months)
- Adult Well-Being: Hope(Baseline to 30 months)
- Family Separation: Separation of Parent and Target Child (Cumulative at any time point)*(6 months to 30 months)
- Housing: Housing Stability(6 months to 30 months)
- Housing: Total time in shelter*(30 months)
- Target Child Development: Child Prosocial Behavior*(30 months)
- Parenting: Early Learning Activities with Target Child*(6 months to 30 months)
- Parenting: Household Routines(Baseline to 30 months)
- Parenting: Target-Child-Focused Expenditure Index(6 months to 30 months)
- Family Separation: Indicated Investigations, Preventive services, or Child Placement of Target Child by Child Protective Services (No/Yes)(30 months)
- Adult Well-Being: Adult Alcohol or Drug Abuse(Baseline to 30 months)
- Financial Well-Being: Financial Well-Being as Measured by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Financial Well-Being Scale(Baseline to 30 months)
- Health Care: Proportion of Target Child Immunizations Recommended by Age by the American Academy of Pediatrics(30 months)
- Health Care: Proportion of Well-Child Visits by Target Child Recommended by Age by the American Academy of Pediatrics(30 months)
- Parenting: Parenting Stress(Baseline to 30 months)
- Financial Well-Being: Financial Hardship as Measured by the Urban Institute Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey(Baseline to 30 months)
- Employment: Income from Employment in Most Recent Period*(30 months)
- Domestic Violence: Adult Domestic Violence*(Baseline to 30 months)
- Financial Well-Being: Food Insecurity*(Baseline to 30 months)
- Financial Well-Being: Adult Economic Stress(Baseline to 30 months)
- Health Care: Family Use of Emergency Medical Care or Hospitalization (Cumulative at any point)*(30 months)
研究者
Beth Shinn
Professor, Department of Human and Organizational Development
Vanderbilt University
