Comparing the Aesthetic Results of Two Common Incisions in External Rhinoplasty A Randomized Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 3 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 56
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Hollunder cosmetic score
研究概览
简要总结
There was not any randomize trial to show what is the best type of incision in open rhinoplasty. So, we use both self-rating by patients ,independent physician observers Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and also a validated scar analysis to compare inverted V and stair step incisions.
详细描述
Approaches to rhinoplasty can be separated into two broad categories: external and endonasal, which each of them their own proponent. However, the external approach provide better exposure, critics against this technique is often due to cosmetic deformity regarding the incision. Hence, over the recent years surgeons have modified the trans-columellar incision into two big categories: gull wing and stair steps. While each of them has its own proponents, there is no randomized trial, comparing their cosmetic results.
There was not any randomize trial to show what is the best type of incision in open rhinoplasty. So, we use both self-rating by patients ,independent physician observers Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and also a validated scar analysis to compare inverted V and stair step incisions.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Factorial
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •All patients who candidate for open rhinoplasty
排除标准
- •Revision cases
- •History of scar
- •Systemic diseases
结局指标
主要结局
Hollunder cosmetic score
时间窗: one year after surgery
The patients will come for office visit and their columella scars will evaluate according to above mentioned scale in one week after surgery, one month after surgery , one year after surgery
次要结局
- Visual analogue score(one year after surgery)
研究者
Babak Saedi
Associate professor
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
