Complete resection rate of cold snare polypectomy: a randomized controlled trial
Phase 3
- Conditions
- colon polyp
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000018328
- Lead Sponsor
- Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital
- Brief Summary
The complete resection rate for CSP is not inferior to that for HSP. CSP can be one of the standard techniques for 4-9mm colorectal polyps.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 780
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
Inflammatory bowel diseases Familial polyposis Patients who take anticoagulants Pregnant women Patients who undergo artificial dialysis Patients who are classified >ASA classIII Others
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Complete resection rate of polypectomy
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rate of post-polypectomy bleeding Polyp retrieval rate Number of times of additional snaring Ratio of difficult case to remove polyps by cold snare polypectomy Procedure time
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms differentiate cold snare polypectomy (CSP) from hot snare polypectomy (HSP) in colorectal tissue ablation?
How does CSP compare to HSP in resecting 4-9mm sessile colorectal polyps: histopathological outcomes and recurrence rates?
Which histopathological biomarkers predict complete resection success in CSP for 4-9mm colorectal polyps?
What are the long-term adverse event profiles of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps?
Are there alternative endoscopic resection devices with higher complete resection rates for 4-9mm colorectal polyps compared to CSP?