MedPath

Effects of Electric Toothbrushes on Periodontal Health and Oral Microbial Flora in Children With Space Maintainers

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Periodontal Parameters
Oral Microbial Colonization
Periodontal Health
Registration Number
NCT07196969
Lead Sponsor
Pamukkale University
Brief Summary

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the effects of electric and manual toothbrushes on periodontal health parameters and salivary microbial flora in children with fixed and removable space maintainers.

Materials and methods: Sixty-eight children (30 girls, 38 boys; mean age 8.8 years) requiring fixed (n=34) or removable (n=34) space maintainers were randomly allocated to electric (n=17) or manual (n=17) toothbrush subgroups. Periodontal indices; plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD) and salivary levels of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus were assessed at baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), and 3 months (T2).

Detailed Description

A total of 68 patients (thirty girls and thirty-eight boys), aged between 6 and 12 years (mean age 8.8), who received either fixed or removable space maintainers due to premature loss of primary molar teeth, were included in the study.

Patients were randomized into two groups based on the type of space maintainer: fixed (n = 34) or removable (n = 34). Each group was further subdivided according to the type of toothbrush used: manual or electric, resulting in four subgroups (n=17). To standardize the study population, only band-and-loop appliances were used in the fixed space maintainer group, which were cemented using a fluoride-releasing glass ionomer cement (RelyX; 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). Removable space maintainers consisted of an acrylic base with retention elements such as Adams' clasps, C clasps, or vestibular archesPatients in the removable space maintainer group were instructed to use their appliances during the day, except while eating and sleeping, and to clean them by brushing after toothbrushing.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
84
Inclusion Criteria
  • Children aged 6-12 years who required a space maintainer due to premature loss of primary molar teeth were included if they were medically healthy; had no periodontal disease, temporomandibular disorders, bruxism, abnormal oral habits, or physical/mental disabilities affecting hand movement; were not on regular medication; had not used antibiotics within the past three months or plaque-preventive agents within the last six months; and were able to comply with scheduled follow-up visits.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients who failed to attend follow-up appointments or developed an infection/disease requiring antibiotic therapy during the study were excluded.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Plaque Index (PI)Baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), and 3 months (T2).

Evaluation of plaque index scores using the Modified Silness and Löe Index.

Change in Gingival Index (GI)Baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), and 3 months (T2)

Evaluation of gingival index scores using the Gingival Index.

Change in Bleeding on Probing (BOP)Baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), and 3 months (T2)

Evaluation of bleeding on probing scores using the Bleeding on Probing (bop) Index

Change in salivary Lactobacillus levelsBaseline (T0), 1 month (T1), and 3 months (T2)
Change in salivary Streptococcus mutans levelsBaseline (T0), 1 month (T1), and 3 months (T2)
Change in Periodontal Pocket Depth (PPD)Baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), and 3 months (T2)

Evaluation of periodontal pocket depth (PPD)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Pamukkale University Faculty of Dentistry

Denizli, Turkey (Türkiye)

Pamukkale University Faculty of Dentistry
Denizli, Turkey (Türkiye)

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.