Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05746936
NCT05746936CompletedNot Applicable

Can Robotic Gastric Bypass be Considered a Valid Alternative to Laparoscopy: Our Early Experience

University of Foggia1 site in 1 country33 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2020Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
33
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
differences between the robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study retrospectively identified 33 consecutive obese patients who underwent either laparoscopic or robotic gastric bypass procedures over a 2-year period.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Retrospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Body mass index (BMI) ≥35-39 kg/m2 with one obesity- associated co-morbidity
  • •BMI≥40kg/m2, age ≥ 18 years.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Re-do surgery procedures

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

differences between the robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass

Time Frame: two years period

weight (kg)

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
University of Foggia
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Giovanna Pavone

Principal Investigator

University of Foggia

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials