CTRI/2019/03/018140
Completed
Phase 1
To assess the rate of orthodontic tooth movement through micro-osteoperforation assisted maxillary anterior en-masse retraction
Dr Pranav Bhasin0 sites60 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- Dr Pranav Bhasin
- Enrollment
- 60
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 4 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •1\. Patient with Angleâ??s Class I malocclusion, Angleâ??s Class I bimaxillary malocclusion and Class II bimaxillary and Angleâ??s class II div I malocclusion requiring 1st premolar extraction and anterior en\-masse retraction
- •2\. Only those patients were included in which atraumatic 1st premolar extraction was done.
- •3\. The performance of MOPs and canine retraction was done at least 4 months after the extraction procedure to remove the bias due to the RAP induced due to extraction.
- •4\. Canine roots to be in cancellous bone.
- •5\. No radiographic evidence of bone loss.
- •6\. Patient with good oral hygiene.
Exclusion Criteria
- •1\. Patients on long term use of antibiotics, phenytoin, cyclosporine, anti\-inflammatory drugs were discarded
- •2\. Patients on systemic corticosteroids and calcium channel blockers were not included in the study.
- •3\. Patients with history of periodontal therapy 4\. Patients with untreated caries, gingivitis and h/o smoking were not included in the study.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing tooth movement rate efficiency,and pain perception between two braces system and a new minimally invasive techniqueHealth Condition 1: null- Class I malocclusion with incisor irregularity of 5-12 mm requiring 1st premolar therapeutic extractionCTRI/2018/03/012331Dr Sonal Attri40
Recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison of Rate of tooth movement with specialized (Self-Ligation brackets) and conventional brackets using custom made vibratory device.Health Condition 1: null- HealthyCTRI/2018/04/013009Dr Vaibhav kumar
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Evaluation of the acceleration of tooth movement when OrthoPulse is applied in case of aligners: a PMCF studyK07Dentofacial anomalies [including malocclusion]DRKS00030906Biolux Technology GmbH98
Recruiting
Phase 3
Evaluation of rate of orthodontic tooth movement by microosteoperforation in combination with low energy laser applicatioCTRI/2024/03/063809shmita Mehta
Completed
Not Applicable
to compare the rate of orthodontic tooth movement assisted by surgical cuts using an implant disc saw and a piezoelectric cutting burCTRI/2021/06/034153srishti syal12