Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00832416
NCT00832416
Completed
Phase 3

A Four-Arm Study Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Tramadol Once a Day 100, 200 and 300 mg Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Labopharm Inc.0 sites565 target enrollmentJanuary 2003

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Placebo
Conditions
Pain
Sponsor
Labopharm Inc.
Enrollment
565
Primary Endpoint
Patient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
14 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of Tramadol Once a Day 100, 200, 300 mg and Placebo

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 2003
End Date
August 2003
Last Updated
14 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Males or Females between the ages of 40-75 with a diagnosis of moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee, consistent with the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Clinical Classification Criteria for Arthritis of the Knee:
  • Current knee pain
  • Less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness with or without crepitus on active motion.
  • Confirmation either by arthroscopy or radiologist's report (X-rays showing osteophytes, joint space narrowing or subchondral bone sclerosis {eburnation}) within five years prior to entry into the study.
  • C-reactive protein (CRP) \< 8 ug/ml (if available at local lab) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) \< 40 mm/hr
  • Total WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index) Pain Subscale Score of \> 150 mm at Baseline corresponding with moderate to severe Osteoarthritis.
  • Oral and written language comprehension at a level sufficient to comply with the protocol and complete study-related materials.
  • Research Ethics Board (REB) approval of the written Informed Consent Form in Spanish or English which was signed and dated by the patient and Investigator, prior to study participation.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Known rheumatoid arthritis or any other rheumatoid disease.
  • Secondary arthritis i.e. any of the following: septic arthritis; inflammatory joint disease; gout; pseudogout; Paget's disease; joint fracture; acromegaly; fibromyalgia; Wilson's disease; ochronosis; haemochromatosis; osteochondromatosis; or collagen gene mutations.
  • Evidence of effusion greater than 15 cubic centimetre (cc) upon physical examination of the joint at Baseline (Visit 1).
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥
  • Major illness, requiring hospitalization during the 3 months before commencement of the screening period.
  • The patient was unwilling to stop taking pain medication (for arthritis or other types of pain) or was unwilling to stop taking other medications for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA).
  • Previous failure or discontinuation (due to adverse events) of tramadol hydrochloride (HCl) therapy.
  • Treatment within the last 3 weeks with any of the following medications: monoamine oxidase inhibitors; tricyclic antidepressants and other tricyclic compounds (e.g. cyclobenzaprine, promethazine); neuroleptics; selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; or any other drug that reduces seizure threshold.
  • Treatment with another investigational agent within the last 30 days.
  • A history of seizure disorder other than Infantile Febrile Seizures.

Arms & Interventions

4: Placebo

Intervention: Placebo

1 Tramadol Once A Day 100mg

Intervention: Tramadol Once A Day

2: Tramadol Once A Day 200mg

Intervention: Tramadol Once A Day

3: Tramadol Once A Day 300mg

Intervention: Tramadol Once A Day

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Patient Global Rating of Pain for the Study Period (12 Weeks)

Time Frame: 12 weeks

3-item Likert-scale: "How do you rate overall pain relief with the drug?" with 3 possible answers: "very effective", "effective", or "ineffective". The average of ratings at visits 2-5 was calculated as median, rounded up to the closest integer.

Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)

Time Frame: Baseline to week 12

Percentage of difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Pain Subscale results from the sum of 5 questions.

Percentage Difference Between WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to the End of the Study (Week 12)

Time Frame: Baseline to week 12

Percentage of difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale score between baseline and week 12. The WOMAC scale is a 24-item questionnaire divided in 3 subscales, using a 100mm visual analog scale ranging from no pain (0mm) to extreme pain (100mm). The WOMAC Physical Function subscale results from the sum of 17 questions.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Percentage Difference in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)(Week 0, week 3, week 6)
  • Percentage Difference in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score From Baseline to Intervening Visits (Visits 2-4)(Week 0, week 3, week 6)
  • Multiple Dose Effect Using 24-hour VAS Pain Questionnaire(12 weeks)
  • Investigator Global Rating of Pain Relief(12 weeks)
  • Percentage of Participants Who Dropped Out From Trial by Dropout Reason(12 weeks)

Similar Trials