跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05505604
NCT05505604进行中(未招募)不适用

Comparison of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) for Hip Fracture Analgesia in Emergency Department Patients

University of Virginia2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2022年9月30日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
入组人数
50
试验地点
2
主要终点
Pain score

研究概览

简要总结

Regional anesthesia for hip fractures has been shown to decrease rates of delirium in elderly patients with hip fractures as well as improve pain compared to systemic opioids. The Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block has recently received attention as an alternative approach to femoral nerve block and Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB). The investigators seek to evaluate if there is a difference between the PENG and FICB in terms of efficacy of pain control in ED patients presenting with hip fracture. We hypothesize that the PENG block may be superior based on previous research.

详细描述

Fractures of the proximal femur are a common presentation to the emergency department and are an acutely painful condition. This condition predominantly affects elderly patients who are at risk for delirium and more susceptible to the adverse effects of systemic opioids. Regional anesthesia is an recommended component of pain control for elderly patients with hip fracture. The investigators seek to compare the efficacy of pain control of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block with the Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB).

Previous studies have suggested that the PENG block may be superior to the FICB for pain control and results in less thigh motor weakness. The investigators will compare pain control (by difference in mean VAS score at set time points), systemic opioid use (in mean morphine equivalents prior to surgery), and motor function in patients with hip fractures who receive either block in the ED.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Proximal femur fracture

排除标准

  • refusal to consent
  • hemodynamic instability
  • allergy to local anesthetics
  • severe injury with instability
  • severe medical conditions with instability

研究组 & 干预措施

PENG

Active Comparator

Patients with hip fracture randomized to receive PENG block

干预措施: PENG (Procedure)

FICB

Active Comparator

Patients with hip fracture randomized to received FICB

干预措施: FICB (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Pain score

时间窗: 6 hours

Median pain score on 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale

次要结局

  • Opioid use(From block administration until time of surgery or 24 hours if surgery performed >24 hours)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Matthew Kongkatong, MD

Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine

University of Virginia

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验